Like most variety collectors, I have almost every book I know about on small cents, and many on buffalo five centers, and I usually try to get the most recent figuring the older published books are outdated. But when this book I am currently reading was mentioned in a prior thread, I found one from one of Amazon's resellers, and it was inexpensive and new. It is Hancock's and Spanbauer's Standard Catalog of United States Altered and Counterfeit Coins ( 1979) 220 pages. It doesn't have the high definition photos of most newer books ( most are line drawing types), but it covers a wider range of deceitful coins and their origins. It also provides much info on practices before I began to really collect this area. I don't want to cover too much, but I found the table of weights and specific gravities of coins very useful. Quite a bit about modern and ancient castings, and modern EDM ( electrical discharge manufacturing ) making of dies. The photo of the 1955/55 DDO fake that the maker had the 2nd strike in the wrong direction or Henning's 1944 Jeffersons where the P was left off. I didn't know that in 1968 one dealer sold 95,000 fake 1909-SVDB coins that could pass eye inspection. Anyway, it is an enjoyable read, I can pass over the part where ANA and ANAC are mentioned as the only safe way to check your coin as PCGS, NGC, etc. were not yet players as I recall. If you don't find way to buy it, ask your college or county library if they participate in Interlibrary loan where they can borrow it from another library for you to read. Jim
Jim, It's great to find out about this book. I'll be looking for it in libraries and book stores. Bruce
Just to add my point, the fact that older reference books are still valuable is treated as gospel in the ancient coin world. I find myself chasing books printed 50/75/100 years ago regularly. About the only coin books that get outdated are the "and their values" type when a new edition is published. One should never think that since they have the standard reference to a series that another, maybe older, book is still not valuable. Knowledge is money, and this is absolutely true in coin collecting. It also allows for deeper, more fulfilling understand of the coins you own and collect, making your collection even more rewarding. Also, a good coin book actually goes up in value faster than the coins they are describing, so it is not an expense really, but an investment itself.
Better still, there are free, legal downloads of most books older than 100 years old. These still contain extremely important historiographical information, if nothing else. For some areas of the ancient world, the best references available are actually almost a century old.
There are also the free on-line references for David Lawrence's books on Barbers. Still a great deal of relevant info.
I haven't seen a recent mention of google books http://books.google.com/advanced_book_search put in doubled die , greek coins , altered coins , etc. and see the variety of information available. Some you can read the whole book if you wish, other not so, but a tremendous storehouse. Jim
I prefer older books. They are usually much better written, more informative, and more comprehensive than a lot of modern reference books. Not to mention, they seem to be geared more towards collecting than investing. I don't want to pay for 500 pages of meaningless coin prices and no information on the coins themselves. Guy~
May I give a different take on the book mentioned in the original post. I bought a copy back when it first came out. While it has some good information, I found it to be poorly written, and in great need of a good editor. It was too repetitive, and with a fair number of typos, incorrectly labeled images and factual errors. I when I read it I kept notes and I had 15 hand written pages of errors or corrections that needed to be made. To a large extent I felt the book was an advertisement for ANACS. But that wasn't too surprising since Virgil Hancock was one of the major driving forces behind the creation of ANACS. It was his baby and he pushed it every chance he got. In this book he got a lot of chances. If you can borrow a copy from a collector or a library it may be worth getting and reading. (ANA members can borrow it from the ANA Library for just the cost of postage.) I would not recommend buying one. As far as information on how counterfeits are made I would more strongly recommend Coin Forgery.
Ok, am I the only one who read this part and went "ackkk!" Of the 95,000 how many have been weeded out and how many are still floating around and routinely traded as the real thing?
I heard something about that when I was a kid. I never knew if it was true, but it is one reason why I have been reluctant to buy key coins in any series, especially ones with mintmarks.
Considering the content of your post, I decided to edit your first paragraph. Your first sentence is a question and should have a question mark. You could remove "back" from the second sentence without a change in meaning (extraneous word). You could remove "to be" in the third sentence (ditto). You could remove ", and" in the fourth sentence (ditto). The fifth sentence should have "I" removed from the beginning of the sentence. Otherwise, the sentence doesn't make any sense. Also, you could remove "that needed to be made" from the end of the sentence (extraneous junk). I like the sixth sentence. I'm not sure if the seventh sentence is a sentence and might be better combined with the sixth sentence. I love the eighth and ninth sentences. I'm being a little facetious (only word in the English language with all the vowels in the correct order). Happy Thanksgiving!
Recently I was able to identify a Roman coin only from a book published in Germany in 1937. The author had seen examples of the coin in a couple of museums.
If you like, as I do, picking up older books, the 1947 "Tribute" Edition Red Book should not be overlooked! Still available it is a 1st edition commemorative reissue Red Book that includes a 60 year market-trend analysis in full color! Enjoy! Happy Thanksgiving CT Members! Steve
Thanks, I'm always in the need of a good editor. I tend to dash off responses, and then post without proofreading.