Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;illini420, post: 708964, member: 19423&quot;]How about a couple of other shots of the same coin for comparison???</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I took these while I was the owner of this one:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><img src="http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm111/illini420/dime01a.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm111/illini420/dime01b.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>And here&#039;s a couple from the previous owner of the coin:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><img src="http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm111/illini420/1939-DMercuryDimePCGSMS64FB002.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /><img src="http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm111/illini420/1939-DMercuryDimePCGSMS64FB003.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Not only are smaller coins harder to get great shots of, I thought this particular coin was pretty tough too.&nbsp; While coins in rattlers are usually pretty easy to photo, the slight haziness on this one was a little challenging to get a nice accurate image.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>T$, I think your second photo does a better job of showing the luster of the coin and I like the new obverse photo better.&nbsp; The new reverse photo seems a little dark to me though and also seems to be a little out of focus maybe??&nbsp; Some of the reverse details just don&#039;t seem to be as sharp I guess. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Of course, both are great shots and that was me just being picky <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in