Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;zumbly, post: 2052689, member: 57495&quot;]Glad to see you&#039;re having fun, Snewman <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />.</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe you&#039;ve already nailed the first one with the RIC VI 120a var attribution.&nbsp; 120a is itself listed in RIC as being scarce, with the mintmark being RS.&nbsp; Yours is the same as the wildwinds example with RP as the mintmark, and hence 120a var.&nbsp; I haven&#039;t seen any with a crescent or a wreath in the mintmark, do you have a link to an example?</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m afraid I can&#039;t be of much help with the other two, but the second coin is a late 3rd century AD potin tetradrachm of Alexandria... you could call these Greek Imperial, or Roman Provincial.&nbsp; I don&#039;t collect these, but many others here do and will be along with help soon.&nbsp; My wild guess would be Maximianus.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think you did well with these just by virtue of the fact that they don&#039;t seem to be missing any devices that will prevent them from being attributed.&nbsp; The potin tet actually looks pretty good, too... I&#039;ve seen many (from a distance <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />) that look alot worse.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in