Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;David@PCC, post: 7847154, member: 80556&quot;]The inscription reads Antioxoy which rules out Seleucus. In fact the OP belongs to a rather scarce and obscure ruler that was the son of Seleucus IV. You should also know this attribution is tentative according to Hoover and may change in the future. Here is my <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-unnamed-antiochus.369832/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-unnamed-antiochus.369832/">post</a> on this ruler.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1350833[/ATTACH]</p><p>Antiochus son of Seleucus IV</p><p>Mint: Antioch on the Orontes</p><p>Denomination C</p><p>September/November 175 BC</p><p>Obvs: Veiled diademed head of Laodice IV right. Dotted border.</p><p>Revs: BAΣIΛEΩΣ ANTIOXOY, elephant head left. Tripod outer right, control mark AT in exergue. Dotted border.</p><p>AE serrate 17mm, 5.04g</p><p>Ref: cf. SC 1371; HGC 9, 612(R2) control mark not listed</p><p>Note: Unpublished[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in