Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;davidh, post: 484783, member: 15062&quot;]Ruben-</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>As seen in the quotes above, I did make favorable comments on the coin&#039;s overall appearance.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>How do you think I&#039;m ignoring the fact that the coin is blown up when it was presented here as a greatly enlarged picture?&nbsp; If we were not to see the defects it should not have been presented as it was.</p><p><br /></p><p>Expecting me to view and comment only on the best part of the coin while ignoring the bad parts without comment is rather disingenuous on your part.</p><p><br /></p><p>As far as rationality, that&#039;s exactly what I am looking for here.&nbsp; Where is the rationality in grading a coin only on it&#039;s better points, while ignoring the points that would otherwise detract from that grading?&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ve asked several questions in this thread to help me understand the entire rationality of the grading process, with this coin as an example.&nbsp; Those questions have not been answered, perhaps you&#039;d like to answer a few of them?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in