Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Slightly rough- Tiberius AS
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="IdesOfMarch01, post: 2725215, member: 39084"]One of the better features of your coin is the detail in the altar on the reverse:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]618390[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The obverse portrait is recognizable and well centered, and although the reverse is off center, the tradeoff of reverse centering vs. detail isn't too bad.</p><p><br /></p><p>Most of these Lugdunum Altar AEs (including those with Tiberius on the obverse) were struck during Augustus' reign, although according to RIC, Tiberius did strike the <i>as</i> denomination during his reign. Typically, these bronzes are weakly struck even when they're otherwise well centered. My first example of an Augustus sestertius (still looking for a new home) was one of the well-centered but weakly struck examples:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]618404[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>AUGUSTUS</p><p>AE Sestertius (25.72 g.) Lugdunum circa 9 - 14 A.D. RIC 231a</p><p>CAESAR AVGVTVS DIVI F PATER PATRIAE Laureate head of Augustus r. </p><p>Rev. ROM ET AVG Altar of Lugdunum.</p><p><br /></p><p>I upgraded this coin in 2015 to an example that had a much better obverse and reverse:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]618413[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Note that even on this example, the reverse is not well centered and the legibility of the ROM ET AVG legend is mostly lost.</p><p><br /></p><p>I'd say all things considered, your Tiberius is a very desirable example of its type.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="IdesOfMarch01, post: 2725215, member: 39084"]One of the better features of your coin is the detail in the altar on the reverse: [ATTACH=full]618390[/ATTACH] The obverse portrait is recognizable and well centered, and although the reverse is off center, the tradeoff of reverse centering vs. detail isn't too bad. Most of these Lugdunum Altar AEs (including those with Tiberius on the obverse) were struck during Augustus' reign, although according to RIC, Tiberius did strike the [I]as[/I] denomination during his reign. Typically, these bronzes are weakly struck even when they're otherwise well centered. My first example of an Augustus sestertius (still looking for a new home) was one of the well-centered but weakly struck examples: [ATTACH=full]618404[/ATTACH] AUGUSTUS AE Sestertius (25.72 g.) Lugdunum circa 9 - 14 A.D. RIC 231a CAESAR AVGVTVS DIVI F PATER PATRIAE Laureate head of Augustus r. Rev. ROM ET AVG Altar of Lugdunum. I upgraded this coin in 2015 to an example that had a much better obverse and reverse: [ATTACH=full]618413[/ATTACH] Note that even on this example, the reverse is not well centered and the legibility of the ROM ET AVG legend is mostly lost. I'd say all things considered, your Tiberius is a very desirable example of its type.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Slightly rough- Tiberius AS
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...