Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;tmoneyeagles, post: 605205, member: 17557&quot;]My 63&#039;s are almost the same, although I can see some differences</p><p>My 1886, looks better than some 64&#039;s I see... But it has a black spot on the reverse, which is holding this coin back, IMO</p><p>The 1896, has near PL fields, although I don&#039;t really know the best way to test that out, but from the pics, having the coin in hand, and also having months to study this coin, I can tell that this would be a more of the high end example of a 63, rather than a full blown upgrade</p><p>The 83O and 84O are good examples of solid 63&#039;s, one, I believe the 84O has a better strike, and the breast feathers are more visible.</p><p>The 1880 S DPL, is accurately graded, and is a very nice one, I don&#039;t think I could make a case for a 64, and think 63 is the right grade, compared to seeing some 62&#039;s and some 64&#039;s</p><p>For the most part, I think I can make my way, around, morgans in MS63-64, but determining a MS64 and a low end MS65 will be tough, although I don&#039;t intend on straying away from 64&#039;s and 63&#039;s, because any grades higher will just run too much[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in