Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Slab-Renew, a scratch removal review
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="geekpryde, post: 2064467, member: 36248"]Good info, and makes sense as to what I am seeing too.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here are my thoughts on the two holders, as I've seen on hundreds of holders from both services newest holders (not counting the optical, scratch-free NGC).</p><p><br /></p><p>NGC slabs are more likely to acquire large amounts of small, accidental, scratches. I have also seen scratches on slabs fresh from NGC too frequently.</p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS slabs are much more likely to "SCUFF", in a small round patch. These scuffs make it hard to see the coin behind it, and are hard to focus beyond for coin photos. I've seen fresh from PCGS slabs that already have these scuff spots. Of course, they are usually directly over the coin faces, and tend to be 1 or 2 per slab when I see them. I also see too many scratches on PCGS slabs that look almost intentional, since they are deep, parallel, and in bunches. To me, those types of PCGS scratches are not picked up incidentally here and there over time (NGC), and seem to be more about mishandling by PCGS / coin owners.</p><p><br /></p><p>Both companies need better scratch protection and better quality control. Coin owners likewise need to stop being so damn rough on their slabs, it would save a lot of money on re-slabbing.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have only ever ordered 1 "scratch-resistant" NGC holder. They are super slick feeling, so its easily to tell them apart once you've held both types. I did NOT actually test what scratch-resistant meant, as I was planning on selling the coin. </p><p><br /></p><p>When I reholder my NGC coins, I will certainly be using the more expensive, scratch resident holders. I actually read somewhere recently that the newer generation PCGS holders are scratch-resistant and don't cost more, so its a better deal than NGC. That is an absolute joke! I would say most PCGS holders with the new hologram are picking up scratches within a few weeks of being slabbed. </p><p><br /></p><p>I also don't understand this, but to me, the older generation of holders, like the NGC Fatty's seem to be better at resisting scratches. I don't know how that can be true, but I've handled a lot of fatties.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="geekpryde, post: 2064467, member: 36248"]Good info, and makes sense as to what I am seeing too. Here are my thoughts on the two holders, as I've seen on hundreds of holders from both services newest holders (not counting the optical, scratch-free NGC). NGC slabs are more likely to acquire large amounts of small, accidental, scratches. I have also seen scratches on slabs fresh from NGC too frequently. PCGS slabs are much more likely to "SCUFF", in a small round patch. These scuffs make it hard to see the coin behind it, and are hard to focus beyond for coin photos. I've seen fresh from PCGS slabs that already have these scuff spots. Of course, they are usually directly over the coin faces, and tend to be 1 or 2 per slab when I see them. I also see too many scratches on PCGS slabs that look almost intentional, since they are deep, parallel, and in bunches. To me, those types of PCGS scratches are not picked up incidentally here and there over time (NGC), and seem to be more about mishandling by PCGS / coin owners. Both companies need better scratch protection and better quality control. Coin owners likewise need to stop being so damn rough on their slabs, it would save a lot of money on re-slabbing. I have only ever ordered 1 "scratch-resistant" NGC holder. They are super slick feeling, so its easily to tell them apart once you've held both types. I did NOT actually test what scratch-resistant meant, as I was planning on selling the coin. When I reholder my NGC coins, I will certainly be using the more expensive, scratch resident holders. I actually read somewhere recently that the newer generation PCGS holders are scratch-resistant and don't cost more, so its a better deal than NGC. That is an absolute joke! I would say most PCGS holders with the new hologram are picking up scratches within a few weeks of being slabbed. I also don't understand this, but to me, the older generation of holders, like the NGC Fatty's seem to be better at resisting scratches. I don't know how that can be true, but I've handled a lot of fatties.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Slab-Renew, a scratch removal review
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...