Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Single squezee doubling, why we still mixt with double squezee?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="silviosi, post: 25219223, member: 153002"]My title it is the question, I present here the two type of the new era coins of the single squezee which start in 1999. What it is your oppinion on this?</p><p><b><br /></b></p><p><b>Class 9 manifests during a single hubbing</b> and can be located centrally or almost throughout the design.</p><p><b><b>There are two types of doubling:</b></b></p><p><b><b><br /></b></b></p><p><b><b>Jolted (Type 1)</b>:</b> mimics offset doubling, and is focused in a hot zone of the central design elements. Parts of a device are replicated in the adjacent open fields. They can be marginal, offset, or even show rotation. There is a maximum spread, and a limit to how much is duplicated. Typically, there is one region on a coin’s design where almost all doubling occurs. This can be surmised by similar doubling found on coins from Denver and Philadelphia. (e.g., 2009 Lincoln cents)</p><p><br /></p><p>This type of doubling is created earlier in the hubbing, when the die can still jolt back into correct position leaving only a trace of doubling. It should be noted that doubling could be caused, at least on occasion, by the press being reset during a hubbing – there is no clear indication as to how often that occurs.</p><p><br /></p><p>Decisive examples include: 2015P 25c NE DDR-004; 2009 1c FY DDR-002; and 2009D 25c DC DDR-001</p><p><br /></p><p><b><b>Roly-poly (Type 2)</b>:</b> The second type is characterized by an offset distorted extra thickness that is roly-poly in appearance. Doubling can manifest over a larger section of the die, including the periphery. Doubling is typically stronger centrally and weakens toward the edge of the design. The doubling is related to type 1, with horizontal play between the hub and die, but the point of contact seems unceasing, and instead of a jolt, it rolls under pressure extruding the design as the tilt stabilizes. On some examples, there is a wobble, accounting for notched corners and separation lines.</p><p><br /></p><p>This type of doubling can be secluded to a small area or can be widespread. The doubling is unlike class 4 with milder separation lines, soft corner notching and a roly-poly extra thickness. It is unlike class 6, in that the distortion is offset, and does not distort toward the edge.</p><p><br /></p><p>Key examples include: 2006 1c DDO-003; 2015 1c DDO-001; 2012P $1 BH DDO-001</p><p><br /></p><p>Silvio[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="silviosi, post: 25219223, member: 153002"]My title it is the question, I present here the two type of the new era coins of the single squezee which start in 1999. What it is your oppinion on this? [B] Class 9 manifests during a single hubbing[/B] and can be located centrally or almost throughout the design. [B][B]There are two types of doubling: Jolted (Type 1)[/B]:[/B] mimics offset doubling, and is focused in a hot zone of the central design elements. Parts of a device are replicated in the adjacent open fields. They can be marginal, offset, or even show rotation. There is a maximum spread, and a limit to how much is duplicated. Typically, there is one region on a coin’s design where almost all doubling occurs. This can be surmised by similar doubling found on coins from Denver and Philadelphia. (e.g., 2009 Lincoln cents) This type of doubling is created earlier in the hubbing, when the die can still jolt back into correct position leaving only a trace of doubling. It should be noted that doubling could be caused, at least on occasion, by the press being reset during a hubbing – there is no clear indication as to how often that occurs. Decisive examples include: 2015P 25c NE DDR-004; 2009 1c FY DDR-002; and 2009D 25c DC DDR-001 [B][B]Roly-poly (Type 2)[/B]:[/B] The second type is characterized by an offset distorted extra thickness that is roly-poly in appearance. Doubling can manifest over a larger section of the die, including the periphery. Doubling is typically stronger centrally and weakens toward the edge of the design. The doubling is related to type 1, with horizontal play between the hub and die, but the point of contact seems unceasing, and instead of a jolt, it rolls under pressure extruding the design as the tilt stabilizes. On some examples, there is a wobble, accounting for notched corners and separation lines. This type of doubling can be secluded to a small area or can be widespread. The doubling is unlike class 4 with milder separation lines, soft corner notching and a roly-poly extra thickness. It is unlike class 6, in that the distortion is offset, and does not distort toward the edge. Key examples include: 2006 1c DDO-003; 2015 1c DDO-001; 2012P $1 BH DDO-001 Silvio[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Single squezee doubling, why we still mixt with double squezee?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...