What should I comment about ? Care to elaborate ? You seem to be contradicting yourself - or do I misunderstand ?
You sort of read me right. The obverse looks very much like a true woodie to me. With most pictures, I think that would pass as a single sided woodie. However, the OP took some real nice pictures. If you look closely at the "I" in AMERICA, you will see a line coming out and continuing through the "T" in CENT, then through the "E in ONE and even out the top. I can see a couple other less defined lines (i.e. the first "T" in STATES and the "D" in UNITED). All are the same direction as the lines on the obverse. I suppose this could all be a coincidence, but I don't think so. Now, if you can have a coin with so little on one side, why not none on one side? I will grant you that the odds are slim, but I do not think they are nil.
Dick I've seen so many strange things in my life I gotta say just about anything is possible. But to me it's more a matter of probability than possibility. It's possible my home could get hit by an asteroid in the next 5 minutes - but I kinda doubt it will
I assume that you saw the article Mike Diamond wrote in the latest Coin World (12-27-10 pg. #90). It seems that we are not the only ones having problems understanding all there is about these coins and more specifically the later one sided woodies. If I am reading him correctly, he believes even these are most like also improper alloy mixes. BTW, I know I am stretching it, but that 1948 is pretty much a one sided woodie at least in some ways.