Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Barney McRae, post: 26454984, member: 150594&quot;]Interesting thread, one I missed previously. Good information here. Still looks like a big roll of the dice by cracking out something already valuable and risking a downgrade as well as wasting grading fees. I do have two items I&#039;d like to crossover to PCGS (and not cracking out unless it crosses). One is a MS Morgan that ANACS gave a details grade to as to color. The ANACS coin show rep himself said it looked like legitimate toning before I submitted. The colorful coin condition was the only reason i bought it, 1884O UNC are a dime a dozen. The other is a NGC 1886 MS65 PL with a top VAM attribution. I want the attribution on the front of the slab, instead of an add on for the reverse. Otherwise, I&#039;d just let it be.&nbsp; Yes, you can say I&#039;m both stubborn and anal about this. Guilty!<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in