Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Show report two: Pompey
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2730452, member: 19463"]Most Janus / prow asses bear generic faces but Sextus Pompey issued this variation with the features of his father, Pompey the Great. At least that is how the catalogs say it. On all I have seen the two faces are different enough that I wonder if one (left?) might have been intended to be Sextus. I have no idea of his true appearance but the right face does look like his father. Last I heard these are attributed to a mint in Sicily 43-35 BC.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]620671[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The coin was cleaned by scratching away deposits a bit too roughly at reverse right and obverse left. At obverse top is MAGN (Magnus=great) with M and A ligate. At reverse top is PIVS but the IMP at bottom is too weak to see. Again it is a case of picking which faults you can tolerate. Such scratching might be called smoothing were it a bit smoother but here it seems a less deceptive form of 'excavating'. </p><p><br /></p><p>This is my second coin of Sextus Pompey. I have shown the fourree denarius below several times. It also has the portrait of Magnus but really has few faults other than the big ugly one that goes with being a fourree. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]620673[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>This is the place to pile on your Pompey portraits.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2730452, member: 19463"]Most Janus / prow asses bear generic faces but Sextus Pompey issued this variation with the features of his father, Pompey the Great. At least that is how the catalogs say it. On all I have seen the two faces are different enough that I wonder if one (left?) might have been intended to be Sextus. I have no idea of his true appearance but the right face does look like his father. Last I heard these are attributed to a mint in Sicily 43-35 BC. [ATTACH=full]620671[/ATTACH] The coin was cleaned by scratching away deposits a bit too roughly at reverse right and obverse left. At obverse top is MAGN (Magnus=great) with M and A ligate. At reverse top is PIVS but the IMP at bottom is too weak to see. Again it is a case of picking which faults you can tolerate. Such scratching might be called smoothing were it a bit smoother but here it seems a less deceptive form of 'excavating'. This is my second coin of Sextus Pompey. I have shown the fourree denarius below several times. It also has the portrait of Magnus but really has few faults other than the big ugly one that goes with being a fourree. [ATTACH=full]620673[/ATTACH] This is the place to pile on your Pompey portraits.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Show report two: Pompey
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...