Should I Dip It......

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by TJ1952, Aug 15, 2016.

  1. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    .....or leave it allow?

    S20160815_001.jpg S20160815_003.jpg S20160815_002.jpg S20160815_004.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Omegaraptor

    Omegaraptor Gobrecht/Longacre Enthusiast

    I vote leave it alone.
     
    TJ1952 and Insider like this.
  4. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    It's going to take a heavy dip to get all that off. I wouldn't try it. JMHO.
     
    TJ1952 likes this.
  5. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

  6. JAY-AR

    JAY-AR Well-Known Member

    I'd leave it alone, coin looks great as is!
     
    TJ1952 likes this.
  7. onecenter

    onecenter Member

    Please do not.
     
    TJ1952 likes this.
  8. Blissskr

    Blissskr Well-Known Member

    I'd also vote leave it alone. Darker toning like that can be very hard to completely remove and you could end up diminishing the coins appearance overall.
     
    TJ1952 likes this.
  9. Omegaraptor

    Omegaraptor Gobrecht/Longacre Enthusiast

    It looks kind of attractive IMO.
     
    TJ1952 likes this.
  10. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    To me the operative word in your question is - I. And my answer to you would be - not unless you know what you're doing.

    But should the coin be dipped ? That's a complicated question. First of all the coin looks to be AU and as such of no value to speak of. Secondly the coin, even in MS65 could easily be replaced for about $20-$25. Then there is the question of has the toning already damaged the coin ? On the obv right hand side in particular the toning looks to be black and quite heavy, so even if dipping was done correctly there may already be damage underneath the toning. If there is then the coin is not even worth AU value.

    But let's assume for the sake of argument that there is no underlying damage, the question then becomes what would you have if you did dip it successfully ? Answer, an AU common coin. But if you do not dip it, then at some point in time that heavy toning already existing is going to damage the coin. That is a given.

    So even though the coin has no value to speak of, it is a certainty that in time it will be of less value. So if you like the coin for your own reasons, then to protect it from any further damage, then yes it should be dipped. But only by somebody who knows what they are doing.

    This is kind of the thought process you need to go through when you ask yourself a question like that. And I may be wrong but I'm assuming that's what you really wanted to know.
     
  11. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  12. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

  13. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Variety Nerd

    Why in the world would you want to dip that one?
     
    joecoincollect likes this.
  14. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    Yes, that is exactly what I needed and wanted to know. Thanks!
     
  15. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member




    I don't necessarily want to. I got the answer I was looking for from your (and others) reply. Thanks!


    (edited to fix quote tags)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 16, 2016
  16. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Variety Nerd

    So you did. I try not to read others comments on gtg threads and ones like this :)
     
    TJ1952 likes this.
  17. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    It's back in the book untouched. Thanks gents!
     
  18. onecenter

    onecenter Member

    Thank you. The numismatic gods are now pleased.
     
    Paul M., RonSanderson and TJ1952 like this.
  19. Noah Finney

    Noah Finney Well-Known Member

  20. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Are they ? What do you think their reaction will be when the coin is damaged because of inaction ?
     
  21. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    Toning is "damage" now? When was that law passed?
     
    joecoincollect likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page