Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Should i buy this roman coin?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 3222091, member: 85693"]Good advice, everybody. I'd like to take a moment to address the actual coin in question. It is an antoninianus of Gallienus (most of you already knew that). When I first started collecting, intermittently, many years ago, I shunned this kind of coin in favor of actual silver (Roman Republic mostly). </p><p><br /></p><p>But my appreciation has grown for this sort of base metal late-empire material, and this OP coin in particular is, in my opinion, a winner. I say this primarily because the portrait is exceptionally well-done for Gallienus. Many of his coins can be quite crude, even cartoonish - these also have their charms - but this one is quite well-executed - again, I love that portrait. The reverse is rather unfortunate, but that is often the case with Gallienus & family. </p><p><br /></p><p>Starting out with Gallienus has another benefit - he has so many reverse types. Hippocamps and stags and centaurs the whole Roman pantheon, pretty much - you name it, it probably wound up on one of his coins. The OP features Pietas, which is not the most exciting type, but you gotta start somewhere.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, Gallienus (and his father) was one of the first emperors to really start decentralizing the mints - so there are a lot of regional varieties and types. </p><p><br /></p><p>Another interesting thing about Gallienus is that the fineness of his antoniniani varied so much you can get some nice silver ones and interesting AE-type patinas. </p><p><br /></p><p>I'll shut up now, but here is one I got a while back that really appealed to me because of the sandy desert patina and Apollo reverse type. The portrait is not as nice as the OP. I paid $6.25 for it. As Doug notes, 30 years from now, it probably won't be worth much more than that, if that. So yeah, don't collect this kind of material for the "investment":</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]839133[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>P.S. Don't forget the wife - 2 from Mrs. Gallienus (Salonina) - Venus from behind and a doe (note "silvery" and old bronze green surfaces):</p><p> </p><p>[ATTACH=full]839138[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]839139[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>P. P. S. Don't forget the kids - here are 2 I just got. Valerian II was the son and heir of Gallienus, but he didn't make it that far. Antioch mint, with a rather startled look. Just posted this elsewhere, but again:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]839136[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]839137[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Marsyas Mike, post: 3222091, member: 85693"]Good advice, everybody. I'd like to take a moment to address the actual coin in question. It is an antoninianus of Gallienus (most of you already knew that). When I first started collecting, intermittently, many years ago, I shunned this kind of coin in favor of actual silver (Roman Republic mostly). But my appreciation has grown for this sort of base metal late-empire material, and this OP coin in particular is, in my opinion, a winner. I say this primarily because the portrait is exceptionally well-done for Gallienus. Many of his coins can be quite crude, even cartoonish - these also have their charms - but this one is quite well-executed - again, I love that portrait. The reverse is rather unfortunate, but that is often the case with Gallienus & family. Starting out with Gallienus has another benefit - he has so many reverse types. Hippocamps and stags and centaurs the whole Roman pantheon, pretty much - you name it, it probably wound up on one of his coins. The OP features Pietas, which is not the most exciting type, but you gotta start somewhere. Also, Gallienus (and his father) was one of the first emperors to really start decentralizing the mints - so there are a lot of regional varieties and types. Another interesting thing about Gallienus is that the fineness of his antoniniani varied so much you can get some nice silver ones and interesting AE-type patinas. I'll shut up now, but here is one I got a while back that really appealed to me because of the sandy desert patina and Apollo reverse type. The portrait is not as nice as the OP. I paid $6.25 for it. As Doug notes, 30 years from now, it probably won't be worth much more than that, if that. So yeah, don't collect this kind of material for the "investment": [ATTACH=full]839133[/ATTACH] P.S. Don't forget the wife - 2 from Mrs. Gallienus (Salonina) - Venus from behind and a doe (note "silvery" and old bronze green surfaces): [ATTACH=full]839138[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]839139[/ATTACH] P. P. S. Don't forget the kids - here are 2 I just got. Valerian II was the son and heir of Gallienus, but he didn't make it that far. Antioch mint, with a rather startled look. Just posted this elsewhere, but again: [ATTACH=full]839136[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]839137[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Should i buy this roman coin?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...