Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 1362757, member: 112&quot;]What you&#039;re asking about Jason really isn&#039;t a workable idea because there is too much of a chocolate/vanilla factor involved. As already stated several times what one person likes another doesn&#039;t.</p><p><br /></p><p>Say you used a toning scale something like DLRC is using with 5 being high and 0 being low. What one person thinks is a 5 another can easily think is a 1 or a 2. And trusting somebody else&#039;s opinion on the toning grade/rating is the same as letting somebody else tell you what your favorite color is for the shirts you wear. It&#039;s just too much of a personal choice.</p><p><br /></p><p>Honestly, grading already has all of this built into it. The two most important factors there are in grading are luster and eye appeal. Toning falls under eye appeal. And since toning is also greatly dependent on luster, then I&#039;d say that grading pretty well covers toning with the system we already have.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in