Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Should be required reading
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="superc, post: 1815299, member: 44079"]For what it is worth, for 'from my heart' collecting I prefer unslabbed coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>For investment collecting I prefer slabbed coins of key date. To me, as a speculator, it is better to have a single slabbed MS or PF, key date specimen than a half dozen XF40 but not rare coins of the same genre. An example would be a bunch of XF40 1916 and 1917 Mercury dimes, vs. a single PCGS slabbed MS63 1916d. I think this is part of what Mr. Reynolds is saying.</p><p><br /></p><p>For 'eye appeal' collecting, i.e., folders, we are stuck with unslabbed coins. There is a market niche out there somewhere for the guy that markets a folder (hopefully no larger than a coffee table book) designed for the various slabbed stuff. I have a Whitman for Mercury dimes I am playing with this week and all of the dimes went in nicely except for the 41/42 which unfortunately is slabbed. This forces the slab to be taped to the back of the book which is unsightly. There are fake 16d and 41/42 coins out there, so buying a certified one seems to be the smartest choice. From 70+ years out the odds of finding a genuine one in pocket change seem slim. Even when 'roll hunting' (if you can find a genuine, still unopened Mercury roll in the possession of someone less than 88 years old) the odds of our finding one of those are lower than the odds of winning the Powerball. Besides, almost all of the unslabbed 16ds I have seen are barely AG3. What I used to call, in Poor Condition. Likewise I have seen some 41/42's being sold in various stages of good/fair which are what I call, mmmm, uh, questionable. Not saying it is fake, just saying my old eyes can't detect the worn overstamp the seller is saying is there. Likewise I did find some decent looking 41/42s that were unslabbed, but I am/was wary of their authenticity. I did a lot of hunting and internal debate before spending the money on some nice clear non-debatable slabbed specimens in XF. LoL, now the debate is should I break them out of their slabs so they will fit in the Whitman books?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="superc, post: 1815299, member: 44079"]For what it is worth, for 'from my heart' collecting I prefer unslabbed coins. For investment collecting I prefer slabbed coins of key date. To me, as a speculator, it is better to have a single slabbed MS or PF, key date specimen than a half dozen XF40 but not rare coins of the same genre. An example would be a bunch of XF40 1916 and 1917 Mercury dimes, vs. a single PCGS slabbed MS63 1916d. I think this is part of what Mr. Reynolds is saying. For 'eye appeal' collecting, i.e., folders, we are stuck with unslabbed coins. There is a market niche out there somewhere for the guy that markets a folder (hopefully no larger than a coffee table book) designed for the various slabbed stuff. I have a Whitman for Mercury dimes I am playing with this week and all of the dimes went in nicely except for the 41/42 which unfortunately is slabbed. This forces the slab to be taped to the back of the book which is unsightly. There are fake 16d and 41/42 coins out there, so buying a certified one seems to be the smartest choice. From 70+ years out the odds of finding a genuine one in pocket change seem slim. Even when 'roll hunting' (if you can find a genuine, still unopened Mercury roll in the possession of someone less than 88 years old) the odds of our finding one of those are lower than the odds of winning the Powerball. Besides, almost all of the unslabbed 16ds I have seen are barely AG3. What I used to call, in Poor Condition. Likewise I have seen some 41/42's being sold in various stages of good/fair which are what I call, mmmm, uh, questionable. Not saying it is fake, just saying my old eyes can't detect the worn overstamp the seller is saying is there. Likewise I did find some decent looking 41/42s that were unslabbed, but I am/was wary of their authenticity. I did a lot of hunting and internal debate before spending the money on some nice clear non-debatable slabbed specimens in XF. LoL, now the debate is should I break them out of their slabs so they will fit in the Whitman books?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Should be required reading
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...