Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 905514, member: 112&quot;]Mark I never denied that, in fact I even agreed with it several times in this thread. The question at hand was very specific, you know that. For me or you to pretend otherwise would be rediculous. And my points were always, every single time, directed at that question and only that question. And they dealt with the very specific point of what stops a coin from being worthy of an MS65 grade.</p><p><br /></p><p>And on that point, and I am only talking about that one specific point, the written standards are explicit. There is no ambiguity whatsoever.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p>Never claimed I could Mark. Would not even pretend that I could.</p><p><br /></p><p>But none of that has anything to do with the very specific question that started this thread.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now you claimed back in the begining that the standard for MS65 was ambiguous as well. But I think I showed rather definively why it is not.</p><p><br /></p><p>So I challenge you to show me otherwise.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in