Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Should a significant mark in a prime focal area prevent a gem grade?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 904672, member: 112"]Yes Tom, I am very well aware of everything you wrote. I have read the ANA guide, all of the editions, many times, cover to cover. And I have pointed out in various discussions many of the same things you pointed out. </p><p><br /></p><p>However, and this entire discussion really boils down to one point, that point being the original question asked - Should a significant mark in a prime focal area prevent a gem grade? </p><p><br /></p><p>On this 1 point both of the written guides we have are quite specific - the answer is no. I really don't think that that point is debatable.</p><p><br /></p><p>Like you, and I think just about anybody else that knows how to grade coins, I also base my grade on the coin as a whole. That is a generality. But when guidelines are given regarding a specific point such as what limits are placed on a coin being worthy of a 65 grade or not - then I think it is a huge mistake for anyone to completely disregard those guidelines. It does the hobby harm to do so. Familiarity breeds acceptance. That is where gradeflation comes from. </p><p><br /></p><p>And as you say, the ANA guide reports what the market considers the grading standards to be. And it clearly reports what those standards are regarding the original question - and thus the answer. So since it reports what the standards are in the marketplace, since it reports the standards that are in use - then shouldn't we use them ?</p><p><br /></p><p>For when we start making excuses, when we start trying to justify our reasoning for assigning a higher grade, when we ignore the established standards and make exceptions - then we go down a path that will lead us to ruin.</p><p><br /></p><p>To be quite honest with you, I think that what the TPGs do today is what the public wants. In other words, they don't grade the coins according to standards anymore - theirs or anybody else's. They assign the grades that the public wants their coins to be graded at. Collectors don't want their coin in VF35 - they want XF40 or 45. They don't want MS63, they want that coin to come back MS64 or 65.</p><p><br /></p><p>That's why we have problem coins in slabs today. That's why we have over-graded coins in slabs today. That is the problem with the grading industry today - they no longer follow the standards - even their own. </p><p><br /></p><p>And you've been around long enough to know this. You've been around long enough to see this. And I can even recall when you have made many of the same complaints that I do.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 904672, member: 112"]Yes Tom, I am very well aware of everything you wrote. I have read the ANA guide, all of the editions, many times, cover to cover. And I have pointed out in various discussions many of the same things you pointed out. However, and this entire discussion really boils down to one point, that point being the original question asked - Should a significant mark in a prime focal area prevent a gem grade? On this 1 point both of the written guides we have are quite specific - the answer is no. I really don't think that that point is debatable. Like you, and I think just about anybody else that knows how to grade coins, I also base my grade on the coin as a whole. That is a generality. But when guidelines are given regarding a specific point such as what limits are placed on a coin being worthy of a 65 grade or not - then I think it is a huge mistake for anyone to completely disregard those guidelines. It does the hobby harm to do so. Familiarity breeds acceptance. That is where gradeflation comes from. And as you say, the ANA guide reports what the market considers the grading standards to be. And it clearly reports what those standards are regarding the original question - and thus the answer. So since it reports what the standards are in the marketplace, since it reports the standards that are in use - then shouldn't we use them ? For when we start making excuses, when we start trying to justify our reasoning for assigning a higher grade, when we ignore the established standards and make exceptions - then we go down a path that will lead us to ruin. To be quite honest with you, I think that what the TPGs do today is what the public wants. In other words, they don't grade the coins according to standards anymore - theirs or anybody else's. They assign the grades that the public wants their coins to be graded at. Collectors don't want their coin in VF35 - they want XF40 or 45. They don't want MS63, they want that coin to come back MS64 or 65. That's why we have problem coins in slabs today. That's why we have over-graded coins in slabs today. That is the problem with the grading industry today - they no longer follow the standards - even their own. And you've been around long enough to know this. You've been around long enough to see this. And I can even recall when you have made many of the same complaints that I do.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Should a significant mark in a prime focal area prevent a gem grade?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...