Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Shield nickel question
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 512674, member: 112"]David - </p><p><br /></p><p>The doubling effect you mention occurs a lot with Proofs. It is because the coins are struck twice. Look at the picture below - you'll see the same thing all over the coin. And you can find it on many, many examples. </p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://images.ha.com/lf?source=url[file:images/inetpub/NewNames/300/4/1/0/4/4104952.jpg],continueonerror[true]&source=url[file:images/inetpub/webuse/no_image_available.gif],if[('global.source.error')]&sink" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>And if you look at that picture, which is much better quality by the way, you can see that there is very, very little attachemnt at the tops and sides of the letters. This was by design, there was not supposed to be much there. And this is a pic of an 1871 Proof to show you what I mean.</p><p><br /></p><p>So what you are seeing is the result of a defective die. It is not because the letters were re-cut.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a pic of an 1869 Proof - same thing, no defect.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://images.ha.com/lf?source=url[file:images/inetpub/NewNames/300/7/0/7/707787.jpg],continueonerror[true]&source=url[file:images/inetpub/webuse/no_image_available.gif],if[('global.source.error')]&sink" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>But all 1870 Proofs are the same. If you examine a lot of them you can even see the progression of where the letter breaks got worse and worse. Like with these 2 below - </p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://images.ha.com/lf?source=url[file:images/inetpub/NewNames/300/4/1/0/6/4106866.jpg],continueonerror[true]&source=url[file:images/inetpub/webuse/no_image_available.gif],if[('global.source.error')]&sink" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://images.ha.com/lf?source=url[file:images/inetpub/NewNames/300/4/3/7/1/4371031.jpg],continueonerror[true]&source=url[file:images/inetpub/webuse/no_image_available.gif],if[('global.source.error')]&sink" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The coin in the OP's post was even struck before these 2 coins above and that can be seen, and verified, by the amount remaining in the missing sections of the letters. That die was not re-cut, the pictures prove it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 512674, member: 112"]David - The doubling effect you mention occurs a lot with Proofs. It is because the coins are struck twice. Look at the picture below - you'll see the same thing all over the coin. And you can find it on many, many examples. [IMG]http://images.ha.com/lf?source=url[file:images/inetpub/NewNames/300/4/1/0/4/4104952.jpg],continueonerror[true]&source=url[file:images/inetpub/webuse/no_image_available.gif],if[('global.source.error')]&sink[/IMG] And if you look at that picture, which is much better quality by the way, you can see that there is very, very little attachemnt at the tops and sides of the letters. This was by design, there was not supposed to be much there. And this is a pic of an 1871 Proof to show you what I mean. So what you are seeing is the result of a defective die. It is not because the letters were re-cut. Here is a pic of an 1869 Proof - same thing, no defect. [IMG]http://images.ha.com/lf?source=url[file:images/inetpub/NewNames/300/7/0/7/707787.jpg],continueonerror[true]&source=url[file:images/inetpub/webuse/no_image_available.gif],if[('global.source.error')]&sink[/IMG] But all 1870 Proofs are the same. If you examine a lot of them you can even see the progression of where the letter breaks got worse and worse. Like with these 2 below - [IMG]http://images.ha.com/lf?source=url[file:images/inetpub/NewNames/300/4/1/0/6/4106866.jpg],continueonerror[true]&source=url[file:images/inetpub/webuse/no_image_available.gif],if[('global.source.error')]&sink[/IMG] [IMG]http://images.ha.com/lf?source=url[file:images/inetpub/NewNames/300/4/3/7/1/4371031.jpg],continueonerror[true]&source=url[file:images/inetpub/webuse/no_image_available.gif],if[('global.source.error')]&sink[/IMG] The coin in the OP's post was even struck before these 2 coins above and that can be seen, and verified, by the amount remaining in the missing sections of the letters. That die was not re-cut, the pictures prove it.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Shield nickel question
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...