Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;usmc60, post: 2606896, member: 76739&quot;]Well I guess that&#039;s what makes it controversial. Believe me I believe the same I thought was A MD. they are saying sens it&#039;s a single strike method&nbsp; used in producing these coins. A lot of the defect is within the die itself. And the more of these I find. I tend to believe what they were saying in their article. If the die shifts so much in the strike, then they Would be other signs of MD other than the particular place.Believe me I have other coins that there is no doubt that it is an MD. But it when it comes to the one like I&#039;m showing there is no other signs. I will try and find the other coin that definitely shows an MD. That way you have two different coins to look at.Like I said I believe it was an MD up until the time I read the article. Then it started making me look at them a little closer. I remember one time way back in 2016. I posted a thread about a rim cud. A majority of the members that responded to that thread said no way. Then a nice gentleman replied to the thread and asked me if he could display it on cuds on coins.So I guess anything is possible.So please have a happy new year. USMC60[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in