Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Shallow vs. Bold "N" on IHCs.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Publius2, post: 24590710, member: 105571"]If you don't want to spend the money on the Snow books, the Whitman book on Flying Eagle and Indian Head Cents is very informative on many matters including the Shallow N/Bold N matter and is available for less than $20 new.</p><p><br /></p><p>And to add to your confusion, for 1870 there is a third reverse that has the characteristics of both shallow and bold N types. It arose when they repunched the shallow N die with bold N punches to make it strike up better. Note that 1871 and 1872 reverses do not show this hybrid. </p><p><br /></p><p>Side note, the 1877 used a shallow N reverse long after the mint stopped using it. Why did they use it again in 1877 when they'd last used it in 1872?</p><p><br /></p><p>As to how to tell the difference between the shallow and bold N types:</p><p><br /></p><p>The shallow N is just more shallowly struck but it's hard to determine without both side-by-side.</p><p><br /></p><p>The shallow N has broader serifs on the N but again, hard to tell without a direct comparison.</p><p><br /></p><p>For me, the easiest tell is that the Bold N has middle serifs on the Es that are shaped like bugle horns. Get it B(ugle) = B(old). The middle E serifs on shallow Ns are shaped more like a T.</p><p><br /></p><p>Attached are pictures of all three types.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1561770[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1561771[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1561772[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Publius2, post: 24590710, member: 105571"]If you don't want to spend the money on the Snow books, the Whitman book on Flying Eagle and Indian Head Cents is very informative on many matters including the Shallow N/Bold N matter and is available for less than $20 new. And to add to your confusion, for 1870 there is a third reverse that has the characteristics of both shallow and bold N types. It arose when they repunched the shallow N die with bold N punches to make it strike up better. Note that 1871 and 1872 reverses do not show this hybrid. Side note, the 1877 used a shallow N reverse long after the mint stopped using it. Why did they use it again in 1877 when they'd last used it in 1872? As to how to tell the difference between the shallow and bold N types: The shallow N is just more shallowly struck but it's hard to determine without both side-by-side. The shallow N has broader serifs on the N but again, hard to tell without a direct comparison. For me, the easiest tell is that the Bold N has middle serifs on the Es that are shaped like bugle horns. Get it B(ugle) = B(old). The middle E serifs on shallow Ns are shaped more like a T. Attached are pictures of all three types. [ATTACH=full]1561770[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1561771[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1561772[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Shallow vs. Bold "N" on IHCs.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...