Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Settle a bet between Wikipedia and Numista
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Troodon, post: 26573987, member: 4626"]It's a good source of basic knowledge, at least on topics that aren't particularly controversial so there's no effort by people to push a certain point of view on things. It actually is a good way to <i>start</i> research, get you acquainted about the topic, then look at what they cite as sources for the article and look those up.</p><p><br /></p><p>I remember when they kept insisting that the Sacagawea dollar was the first US coin to depict someone still alive... something contradicted by their own articles. I mean, first of all, they were counting models that artists used, and if you count those... almost all US coins would count. If you don't count models, Sacagawea was obviously not still alive in 2000. Even if it somehow counted... it would not be the first, quite a few coins predating 2000 also depicted people still alive at the time, and they weren't just an image based on a model, but representative of the actual person. The real funny thing? When I tried pointing this out to the person that kept reverting my edits, they claimed that the Wikipedia articles that refuted the claim... weren't reliable sources lol. Well fine, I cited Red Book and many other sites that proved there wasn't any way to come up with any criteria that would make the Sacagawea dollar the first US coin depicting someone still living, I don't even know where anyone got that idea. (Fun fact: we don't even in fact know what Sacagawea actually looked like... there's no existing portrait of her done by someone that actually saw her during her lifetime. All portraits are basically just guesses at what she may have looked like. The portrait on the Sacagawea dollar is based on someone from Sacagawea's tribe that posed as the model for it.)</p><p><br /></p><p>Sorry if that was too long a detour from the topic at hand but I always remember this from the one time I attempted to correct a mistake in Wikipedia. BTW they did eventually remove the claim about the Sacagawea dollar anyway.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Troodon, post: 26573987, member: 4626"]It's a good source of basic knowledge, at least on topics that aren't particularly controversial so there's no effort by people to push a certain point of view on things. It actually is a good way to [I]start[/I] research, get you acquainted about the topic, then look at what they cite as sources for the article and look those up. I remember when they kept insisting that the Sacagawea dollar was the first US coin to depict someone still alive... something contradicted by their own articles. I mean, first of all, they were counting models that artists used, and if you count those... almost all US coins would count. If you don't count models, Sacagawea was obviously not still alive in 2000. Even if it somehow counted... it would not be the first, quite a few coins predating 2000 also depicted people still alive at the time, and they weren't just an image based on a model, but representative of the actual person. The real funny thing? When I tried pointing this out to the person that kept reverting my edits, they claimed that the Wikipedia articles that refuted the claim... weren't reliable sources lol. Well fine, I cited Red Book and many other sites that proved there wasn't any way to come up with any criteria that would make the Sacagawea dollar the first US coin depicting someone still living, I don't even know where anyone got that idea. (Fun fact: we don't even in fact know what Sacagawea actually looked like... there's no existing portrait of her done by someone that actually saw her during her lifetime. All portraits are basically just guesses at what she may have looked like. The portrait on the Sacagawea dollar is based on someone from Sacagawea's tribe that posed as the model for it.) Sorry if that was too long a detour from the topic at hand but I always remember this from the one time I attempted to correct a mistake in Wikipedia. BTW they did eventually remove the claim about the Sacagawea dollar anyway.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Settle a bet between Wikipedia and Numista
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...