Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Troodon, post: 434103, member: 4626&quot;]I&#039;m pretty sure their interpretation of the &quot;30-day rule&quot; is why they crafted their policy the way they do.&nbsp; However I think they may very well be in violation in this case since by their own admission, they know the presentation case will not arrive in 30 days.&nbsp; It was supposedly shipped in the same box as the medal... but the medal&#039;s here, the case is not, and they know it will not arrive separetely no matter how long they make me wait.</p><p><br /></p><p>BTW according to the rule it is 30 days from when I ordered, not when they shipped it... so they&#039;d be in violation quite a bit earlier than Oct. 25.</p><p><br /></p><p>Chargeback may be a bit complicated since they sent me part of what I ordered, not all of it... can you chargeback just a portion of a transaction?&nbsp; In this case, the amount the case alone costs?</p><p><br /></p><p>At any rate dealing with it will take just as long as waiting anyway, probably.&nbsp; Though I will certaintly consider more drastic remedies if they try fighting me when Oct. 25 rolls around!&nbsp; Especially if they try the &quot;well according to our records, we already sent it...&quot;.&nbsp; I&#039;ve dealt with others before enough times to know the burden of proof is on them that they sent it, not on me that they didn&#039;t (for both legal and logical reasons).</p><p><br /></p><p>In the end I don&#039;t want to expend more time and effort than the $3 case is worth (why I&#039;m willing to wait, for now...) but there&#039;s a principle that&#039;s worth fighting for here to some degree.&nbsp; I recently had to deal with an eBay seller pulling the same thing and have almost zero patience for people trying to drag their feet when it comes to giving me something I already paid for.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in