Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Serious Question (about grading)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2453950, member: 24314"]GREAT POST!</p><p><br /></p><p>1. Standards have dropped. Everyone knows that.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. I know/have known quite a few TPG's and at least five TPGS Finalizers. NO ONE has ever even hinted to me they are told how to grade. To become a grader you either need to be "connected" or you need to be referred and tested to see if you can make the cut. I myself tried to get a position at ANACS in CO long ago.</p><p><br /></p><p>3. Company "standards" is a moving target...they can change SLIGHTLY with the market. Graders know how to grade, that's why they were hired in the first place. If their opinions differ too much from the finalizers they are either let go or given some instruction. For example: If I were calling all the old AU-58 Saints (from the 1970's - 80's) AU due to my personal standards rather than MS-62; I would be shown the "company line" for acceptable high point rub. </p><p><br /></p><p>4. The "Boss" finalizer is the one who sets the standards. A "boss" can have a bad day or week as they are human. That's why we can find under-graded, and over-graded coins in slabs.</p><p><br /></p><p>5. TPGS's are not out to get us. They don't have meetings to adjust grades. While everyone claims/or is certain that major collections, rarities, and major clients get a break on occasion; that would not be the best business practice to pursue on a very large scale. What can happen is a major client can put heat on the company to get better grades. It is like a baseball manager arguing with the umpire. That MAY influence the boss a little but the bottom line is this: The pain in the butt needs the TPGS as much as they need his business. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie60" alt=":kiss:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>2</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This is pure uninformed nonsense. IMO, "Ordered" is a very bad choice of words. The ENTIRE NUMISMATIC COMUNITY except for old time hold outs such as myself HAS BEEN GRADING AU COINS AS UNC FOR DECADES. Many years before PCGS was a gleam in Hall's eye!</p><p><br /></p><p>Consider this, all the YN's and present day collectors are being trained in the "Loose" standard for Unc as it exists today. In ten years or so "no trace of wear" will be a footnote in the grading guide because it is not followed as a standard even today![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2453950, member: 24314"]GREAT POST! 1. Standards have dropped. Everyone knows that. 2. I know/have known quite a few TPG's and at least five TPGS Finalizers. NO ONE has ever even hinted to me they are told how to grade. To become a grader you either need to be "connected" or you need to be referred and tested to see if you can make the cut. I myself tried to get a position at ANACS in CO long ago. 3. Company "standards" is a moving target...they can change SLIGHTLY with the market. Graders know how to grade, that's why they were hired in the first place. If their opinions differ too much from the finalizers they are either let go or given some instruction. For example: If I were calling all the old AU-58 Saints (from the 1970's - 80's) AU due to my personal standards rather than MS-62; I would be shown the "company line" for acceptable high point rub. 4. The "Boss" finalizer is the one who sets the standards. A "boss" can have a bad day or week as they are human. That's why we can find under-graded, and over-graded coins in slabs. 5. TPGS's are not out to get us. They don't have meetings to adjust grades. While everyone claims/or is certain that major collections, rarities, and major clients get a break on occasion; that would not be the best business practice to pursue on a very large scale. What can happen is a major client can put heat on the company to get better grades. It is like a baseball manager arguing with the umpire. That MAY influence the boss a little but the bottom line is this: The pain in the butt needs the TPGS as much as they need his business. :kiss: 2 This is pure uninformed nonsense. IMO, "Ordered" is a very bad choice of words. The ENTIRE NUMISMATIC COMUNITY except for old time hold outs such as myself HAS BEEN GRADING AU COINS AS UNC FOR DECADES. Many years before PCGS was a gleam in Hall's eye! Consider this, all the YN's and present day collectors are being trained in the "Loose" standard for Unc as it exists today. In ten years or so "no trace of wear" will be a footnote in the grading guide because it is not followed as a standard even today![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Serious Question (about grading)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...