Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jmferris, post: 2419847, member: 78421&quot;]That is exactly my approach right now.&nbsp; My primary focus is on LSHDs and LSDs, with only some ancillary attention to the few other series that I have.&nbsp; So, if something catches my eye outside of those, I will go after it, but not actively pursuing the series.</p><p><br /></p><p>I enjoy the gambling aspect of it, as well.&nbsp; Very recently picked up an 1887-S LSD that was advertised as being XF with poor pictures, for well under value.&nbsp; Looked like the seller had under-graded it, to me, and in hand, I am sure he did.&nbsp; Fun part of that one is doing the variety attribution for it.&nbsp; It will be worthy of its own thread at some point, because I keep coming back to the possibility of it being an impaired proof, based on the complete and total lack of doubling/filled/filed mintmark.&nbsp; Either way, it was $40 well-spent.&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in