Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Septimius Severus, Denarius, IMP
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2099321, member: 19463"]The variations of Fortuna from Laodicea seem endless. I have many fewer than Martin but find some interesting. For some reason I always bought more of the Emesa coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>Normal IMP II with the Hilaritas version Fortuna</p><p>[ATTACH=full]394498[/ATTACH] </p><p>One I of IMP II relocated to other side of bust point and reverse is spelled RDEVC. PERT is PERET.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]394499[/ATTACH] </p><p>Now both I's are over there; Fortuna sits with rudder but still uses RDEVC. PERT is PERET.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]394500[/ATTACH] </p><p>Standing, we lose the D altogether leaving REVC.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]394501[/ATTACH] </p><p>This is an IMPVIII coin. There are no IMPVI coins but some dies lost the extra I's to the other side of the bust and off flan. I have this die with a non-Fortuna reverse with all the I's but only Fortunas get shown here. The reverse is normal.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]394502[/ATTACH] </p><p>The obverse splits off only one of the final I's but the odd part is SEV has become SEVER. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]394503[/ATTACH] </p><p>A bit crowded but the entire VIII is forced in the space. The reverse figure traded her rudder for a second cornucopia.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]394504[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>I have no idea how many minor variations of these things there are. There once was 'discussion' on the existence of the IMP date numerals but I believe all concerned now accept that there are only IMP II and IMPVIII coins. The rest are misreadings based on separated one or two final strokes. The last two coins are later and have the broad flans that we find more often on the even later 'New Style' Laodicea coins. In general I start the term 'New Style' in the middle of IMP VIII when the mint started using a different set of reverses matching those from Rome rather that the Old Style types as seen on the Emesa coins. </p><p><br /></p><p>To me the big question is how many mints were are dealing with here starting with the Emesa obverses ending in AVG and progressing through the end of New Style Laodicea which has SEVERVS PIVS AVG obverses.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2099321, member: 19463"]The variations of Fortuna from Laodicea seem endless. I have many fewer than Martin but find some interesting. For some reason I always bought more of the Emesa coins. Normal IMP II with the Hilaritas version Fortuna [ATTACH=full]394498[/ATTACH] One I of IMP II relocated to other side of bust point and reverse is spelled RDEVC. PERT is PERET. [ATTACH=full]394499[/ATTACH] Now both I's are over there; Fortuna sits with rudder but still uses RDEVC. PERT is PERET. [ATTACH=full]394500[/ATTACH] Standing, we lose the D altogether leaving REVC. [ATTACH=full]394501[/ATTACH] This is an IMPVIII coin. There are no IMPVI coins but some dies lost the extra I's to the other side of the bust and off flan. I have this die with a non-Fortuna reverse with all the I's but only Fortunas get shown here. The reverse is normal. [ATTACH=full]394502[/ATTACH] The obverse splits off only one of the final I's but the odd part is SEV has become SEVER. [ATTACH=full]394503[/ATTACH] A bit crowded but the entire VIII is forced in the space. The reverse figure traded her rudder for a second cornucopia. [ATTACH=full]394504[/ATTACH] I have no idea how many minor variations of these things there are. There once was 'discussion' on the existence of the IMP date numerals but I believe all concerned now accept that there are only IMP II and IMPVIII coins. The rest are misreadings based on separated one or two final strokes. The last two coins are later and have the broad flans that we find more often on the even later 'New Style' Laodicea coins. In general I start the term 'New Style' in the middle of IMP VIII when the mint started using a different set of reverses matching those from Rome rather that the Old Style types as seen on the Emesa coins. To me the big question is how many mints were are dealing with here starting with the Emesa obverses ending in AVG and progressing through the end of New Style Laodicea which has SEVERVS PIVS AVG obverses.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Septimius Severus, Denarius, IMP
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...