Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Septimius Severus, Clashed Die?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2452880, member: 19463"]100% correct! This is a clashed die. It is not the strongest one by any means but it most certainly is there with the beard under the horse being the most clear sign. If anyone reading this is unclear on the term, I'll give the link to my page obviously more than most will want to know on the subject. </p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/brock.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/brock.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/brock.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Since clashes are caused by an error, each will be different mostly due to just how hard the dies were driven into each other. I suspect some were lessened as the hammerman realized there was no flan and tried to stop the swing (probably accompanied by an expletive not taught in high school Latin). Others got a full swing by a hammerman who looked like a modern bodybuilder. Some are very uneven suggesting a glancing blow which would also be consistent with someone trying to stop swinging but unable to do so (those hammers were heavy). Note how strong the clash is on the reverse right while the left seems undamaged.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]512655[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>There seem to be more Severan clashes than some other periods but Claudius II is also a place to seek them. I can not explain why. I do wonder if some mint masters destroyed dies that were damaged while others saw nothing wrong with using them. </p><p><br /></p><p>Most clashes show as damage to the reverse die rather than the obverse. This could be just because the top die was more vulnerable to damage since it was the one being hit or it could suggest that the anvil die metal was hardened more. There are obverse clashes including many from periods that probably used pincher dies that could be hit on either side. Another possibility is that an obverse clashed die could be the survivor of such a severe clash that the reverse die was destroyed and replaced. This is my best guess for the Julia Mamaea obverse below.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]512656[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2452880, member: 19463"]100% correct! This is a clashed die. It is not the strongest one by any means but it most certainly is there with the beard under the horse being the most clear sign. If anyone reading this is unclear on the term, I'll give the link to my page obviously more than most will want to know on the subject. [url]http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/brock.html[/url] Since clashes are caused by an error, each will be different mostly due to just how hard the dies were driven into each other. I suspect some were lessened as the hammerman realized there was no flan and tried to stop the swing (probably accompanied by an expletive not taught in high school Latin). Others got a full swing by a hammerman who looked like a modern bodybuilder. Some are very uneven suggesting a glancing blow which would also be consistent with someone trying to stop swinging but unable to do so (those hammers were heavy). Note how strong the clash is on the reverse right while the left seems undamaged. [ATTACH=full]512655[/ATTACH] There seem to be more Severan clashes than some other periods but Claudius II is also a place to seek them. I can not explain why. I do wonder if some mint masters destroyed dies that were damaged while others saw nothing wrong with using them. Most clashes show as damage to the reverse die rather than the obverse. This could be just because the top die was more vulnerable to damage since it was the one being hit or it could suggest that the anvil die metal was hardened more. There are obverse clashes including many from periods that probably used pincher dies that could be hit on either side. Another possibility is that an obverse clashed die could be the survivor of such a severe clash that the reverse die was destroyed and replaced. This is my best guess for the Julia Mamaea obverse below. [ATTACH=full]512656[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Septimius Severus, Clashed Die?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...