Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Septimius September!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 7927267, member: 19463"]NOOOOOO! In fact it is a great injustice that September has only 30 days. This was caused by that great egomaniac Augustus that insisted his month be as long as July thus disrupting the orderly progression of long and short months alternating through the year. September should have been a long month like the odd numbered months before it. We must do our part now to right this wrong. Therefore, my final post will honor the memory of that victim of time, September 31st.</p><p><br /></p><p>31. Since September 31 is not generally recognized as an 'official' day my offering will honor a coin which is similarly not accepted as 'official' but is my favorite unofficial coin of Septimius Severus. It is a Legionary struck in honor of LEG VII CL (or is it ITAL) in a style just not right for the mint at Rome or any of the other recognized branch mints. The obverse reads the usual IMP CAE L SEP SEV PERT AVG but continues with the remnants of an undertype not perfectly clear. The enlarged inset has been inverted in the photo below to make it easier to see if not decipher. Does it say "NI"? </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1370039[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>I love my status as an amateur and meaningless believer in fanciful numismatics allowing me to see what I want to see and not have to be peer reviewed or 'publish or perish'. What my whim proposes here is a mint operation tasked to convert dangerous to own (Septimius might not a be a fan of people who had a lot of cash bearing the face of Pescennius Niger) denarii into something that could be circulated in relative safety. To prove this, I would have to find a few more coins of this style or from these dies allowing more clear reading and showing traces of undertype. That is quite unlikely so the legitimate literature will ignore this coin just as it does the proper place in the calandar of this day, September 31.</p><p><br /></p><p>Our back-up coin for this non-day is not in my collection because it was part of the great collection of the late Roger Bickford-Smith transferred to the British Museum rather than being sold off in CNG47 (1998) with his other coins deemed unworthy. I was aware of the coin from my correspondence with Roger and was hoping it would be found uninteresting and passed on to someone like me. It is a standard enough coin of 'Emesa' style clearly showing an undertype reading PESC (obverse left). At least one coin of Pescennius Niger was overstruck. Were there many? Will more turn up in junk lots? If it exists, would the mainstream market find such coins worthy of being cataloged?Probably not but it is what I am hoping to see someday.</p><p><a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1997-1203-107" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1997-1203-107" rel="nofollow">https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1997-1203-107</a> </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1370047[/ATTACH]</p><p>For the record, I believe the undertype of the BM coin was probably like this one:</p><p><a href="https://cngcoins.com/Lot.aspx?LOT_ID=37572&BACK_URL=%2fLots.aspx%3fIS_ADVANCED%3d1%26ITEM_IS_SOLD%3d1%26ITEM_INVENTORY_NUMBER%3d%26CONTAINER_NAME%3d492%26ITEM_LOT_NUMBER%3d384%26ITEM_DESC%3d%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_1%3d1%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_3%3d1%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_2%3d1%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_4%3d1%26VIEW_TYPE%3d0" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://cngcoins.com/Lot.aspx?LOT_ID=37572&BACK_URL=%2fLots.aspx%3fIS_ADVANCED%3d1%26ITEM_IS_SOLD%3d1%26ITEM_INVENTORY_NUMBER%3d%26CONTAINER_NAME%3d492%26ITEM_LOT_NUMBER%3d384%26ITEM_DESC%3d%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_1%3d1%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_3%3d1%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_2%3d1%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_4%3d1%26VIEW_TYPE%3d0" rel="nofollow">https://cngcoins.com/Lot.aspx?LOT_ID=37572&BACK_URL=/Lots.aspx?IS_ADVANCED=1&ITEM_IS_SOLD=1&ITEM_INVENTORY_NUMBER=&CONTAINER_NAME=492&ITEM_LOT_NUMBER=384&ITEM_DESC=&SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_1=1&SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_3=1&SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_2=1&SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_4=1&VIEW_TYPE=0</a></p><p><img src="https://cngcoins.com/Photos.AM/4-2FS4RH/4-2FUP1O.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>September! Like my time as an active collector of ancient coins, it was fun while it lasted. I hope this thread will cause a few of you to become interested in Septimius Severus (and consider buying my coins from my grandson when they become his inheritance). Caesar Augustus destroyed the old order Roman Republic and replaced it with a system where claiming to be the heir of the previous ruler made one the next ruler. Septimius Severus introduced a new idea that caught on rather well in the next centuries based on the premise that the true ruler was the guy with the strongest army and no qualms about using that army to eliminate those who did not accept his truth. Both Augustus and Septimius had the same fatal flaw. Neither was able to provide Rome with a satisfactory and competent way of transferring power other than using the system that had brought them into prominence. Septimius tried to legitimize himself by reverse adoption into the line of Marcus Aurelius (I don't think anyone showed one of those coins) but what he did leave was proof of the fact that the big dog tends to win the fight. I wish I could say that bullies are not still in operation today. </p><p><br /></p><p>At reverse left DIVI M PII F showing Septimius' claim to being son of the divine Marcus. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1370054[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 7927267, member: 19463"]NOOOOOO! In fact it is a great injustice that September has only 30 days. This was caused by that great egomaniac Augustus that insisted his month be as long as July thus disrupting the orderly progression of long and short months alternating through the year. September should have been a long month like the odd numbered months before it. We must do our part now to right this wrong. Therefore, my final post will honor the memory of that victim of time, September 31st. 31. Since September 31 is not generally recognized as an 'official' day my offering will honor a coin which is similarly not accepted as 'official' but is my favorite unofficial coin of Septimius Severus. It is a Legionary struck in honor of LEG VII CL (or is it ITAL) in a style just not right for the mint at Rome or any of the other recognized branch mints. The obverse reads the usual IMP CAE L SEP SEV PERT AVG but continues with the remnants of an undertype not perfectly clear. The enlarged inset has been inverted in the photo below to make it easier to see if not decipher. Does it say "NI"? [ATTACH=full]1370039[/ATTACH] I love my status as an amateur and meaningless believer in fanciful numismatics allowing me to see what I want to see and not have to be peer reviewed or 'publish or perish'. What my whim proposes here is a mint operation tasked to convert dangerous to own (Septimius might not a be a fan of people who had a lot of cash bearing the face of Pescennius Niger) denarii into something that could be circulated in relative safety. To prove this, I would have to find a few more coins of this style or from these dies allowing more clear reading and showing traces of undertype. That is quite unlikely so the legitimate literature will ignore this coin just as it does the proper place in the calandar of this day, September 31. Our back-up coin for this non-day is not in my collection because it was part of the great collection of the late Roger Bickford-Smith transferred to the British Museum rather than being sold off in CNG47 (1998) with his other coins deemed unworthy. I was aware of the coin from my correspondence with Roger and was hoping it would be found uninteresting and passed on to someone like me. It is a standard enough coin of 'Emesa' style clearly showing an undertype reading PESC (obverse left). At least one coin of Pescennius Niger was overstruck. Were there many? Will more turn up in junk lots? If it exists, would the mainstream market find such coins worthy of being cataloged?Probably not but it is what I am hoping to see someday. [URL]https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/C_1997-1203-107[/URL] [ATTACH=full]1370047[/ATTACH] For the record, I believe the undertype of the BM coin was probably like this one: [URL]https://cngcoins.com/Lot.aspx?LOT_ID=37572&BACK_URL=%2fLots.aspx%3fIS_ADVANCED%3d1%26ITEM_IS_SOLD%3d1%26ITEM_INVENTORY_NUMBER%3d%26CONTAINER_NAME%3d492%26ITEM_LOT_NUMBER%3d384%26ITEM_DESC%3d%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_1%3d1%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_3%3d1%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_2%3d1%26SEARCH_IN_CONTAINER_TYPE_ID_4%3d1%26VIEW_TYPE%3d0[/URL] [IMG]https://cngcoins.com/Photos.AM/4-2FS4RH/4-2FUP1O.jpg[/IMG] September! Like my time as an active collector of ancient coins, it was fun while it lasted. I hope this thread will cause a few of you to become interested in Septimius Severus (and consider buying my coins from my grandson when they become his inheritance). Caesar Augustus destroyed the old order Roman Republic and replaced it with a system where claiming to be the heir of the previous ruler made one the next ruler. Septimius Severus introduced a new idea that caught on rather well in the next centuries based on the premise that the true ruler was the guy with the strongest army and no qualms about using that army to eliminate those who did not accept his truth. Both Augustus and Septimius had the same fatal flaw. Neither was able to provide Rome with a satisfactory and competent way of transferring power other than using the system that had brought them into prominence. Septimius tried to legitimize himself by reverse adoption into the line of Marcus Aurelius (I don't think anyone showed one of those coins) but what he did leave was proof of the fact that the big dog tends to win the fight. I wish I could say that bullies are not still in operation today. At reverse left DIVI M PII F showing Septimius' claim to being son of the divine Marcus. [ATTACH=full]1370054[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Septimius September!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...