Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mac McDonald, post: 7750328, member: 117420&quot;]Yes, it&#039;s getting out of hand, but I&#039;m not referring to counterfeit coins, if indeed they may be...but rather the dropping of accusations/suspicions of same in our laps here at CT and expecting us to take it from there, to do the investigating and reporting of them, et al.&nbsp; Is that the job of CT, its mods, et al...?&nbsp; What is the CT rule/policy on this sort of thing...?&nbsp; Who does what, when these things are dropped here like this...?&nbsp; I really don&#039;t know...maybe someone can enlighten me.&nbsp; I will say, however, that in this case I actually don&#039;t/can&#039;t see what&#039;s being alleged about these &quot;counterfeit&quot; (maybe not) coins...the &quot;applied toning,&quot; &quot;signature hit,&quot; et al.&nbsp; The 1878-CC photo is mixed up with an 1891-CC listing, but that&#039;s all I (can) see other than some worn/blurred, unattractive Morgans.&nbsp; And mixing up a listing...it happens...doesn&#039;t make someone a counterfeiter...a criminal.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in