Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2475769, member: 28107&quot;]So it appears that SEGS modified the guarantee language on its website to SEGS&#039;s advantage.&nbsp; You should keep an archive of the</p><p>original guarantee or, in my opinion, it looks like attempted spoliation of evidence.&nbsp; I cannot imagine an attorney advising his client to do so and then post about it online for all to see.&nbsp; This makes it look (in my opinion) like SEGS does not have a valid defense or explanation and that the putative change in corporate structure was nothing more than an attempt to evade creditors. </p><p><br /></p><p>If there was a valid reason for the rejection of the claims and there was a misunderstanding, SEGS would have come forward at least to the parties disputing the denial of their guarantee claims.&nbsp; Instead, it looks like (in my opinion) it would rather attempt to hide behind its attorneys and website revisions rather than making things right.&nbsp; This is quite revealing in my humble opinion, and I predict SEGS&#039;s own actions will hurt its bottom line long term.</p><p><br /></p><p>For legal purposes, everything in this post is meant as opinion and not fact unless explicitly stated otherwise.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in