Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2445730, member: 28107&quot;]When you send letters to the submitter outlining that the submitter is correct and admitting that you are not honoring the guarantee, there is really nothing more damning that can be said on an online forum.&nbsp; The question of whether the guarantee was honored or not is evident as it is was expressly admitted that the coin was originally overgraded.&nbsp; I have a signed letter admitting as much, but will not publish until after the conclusion of my dispute.</p><p><br /></p><p>The sole questions that remain as to liability are to the change in corporate structure.&nbsp; Is the new SEGS merely an alter ego of the previous corporation created for the purpose of evading liability and creditors?&nbsp; Alternatively, are there legitimate reasons for the creation of the new entity as suggested here?&nbsp; That information can be obtained by subpoena if anyone pushes it that far, so I think clamming up does nothing but further anger submitters.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in