Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 2443611, member: 36230&quot;]Roper room should&#039;ve been dismissed pages ago... Now, please.. you completely removed it from its context; I know it, you know it, and anyone who can read does too. Anyone, aside from yourself, with half a brain could clearly see that IN NO WAY was I saying what you accused me of. Again and again in this thread I&#039;ve voiced my opinion that he indeed NEEDS TO STAND BEHIND HIS GUARANTEE, yet here you are accusing me of just the opposite. Brilliant!</p><p><br /></p><p>Do I blame the OP? Absolutely, and for the fact that she believes, or at least believed, that she was owned THIRTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS; is this really that unreasonable or hard to understand? This is about EXPECTATIONS, and those of the OP are, or at least were, wholly unrealistic. Tell me, baseball, do you think Mr. Briggs was &quot;guaranteeing&quot; some newbie could buy a coin and cross it at grade? Do you think he was &quot;guaranteeing&quot; if someone who shouldn&#039;t be buying coins overpays, that he&#039;d cover their losses and perhaps toss them a ridiculous windfall for good measure? Of couse not... you&#039;re smarter than that (I think) yet here you are dismissing completely reasonable and best-case resolutions in favor of what? Come on.... you tell us what you think this guarantee means or what you think is fair. Should she get the $5k solely because that&#039;s what she paid (regardless of if that&#039;s what the coin would have been worth as a SEGS66), or should Mr. Briggs be a doll and just cough up the $13k to be a sweetheart? If paying her based upon what the same date/mint/denomination in SEGS66 plastic is &quot;worth&quot;, or paying the difference between that number and the same for a SEGS66 so disgusts you, please share what you feel is an equitable solution.</p><p>.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in