Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Seeking an opinion...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Spark1951, post: 26002454, member: 90692"]As noted, the ‘73 has too much wear on both sides and is a common coin. The unofficial benchmark for slabbing is to have a coin worth at least $150 to justify the costs of grading, attribution, insurance and shipping (insurance and shipping is paid for there and back). You can have lesser value coins slabbed for personal reasons but don’t expect to recoup those mandatory costs.</p><p><br /></p><p>The ‘59 does appear to be an impaired proof. It looks to have full steps, too, but as a proof it does not qualify for full step (FS) attribution. The TPGs do not award the designation on labels due to the fact all proof Jefferson nickels <b>should have</b> full steps ( if they don’t then it is a poorly struck proof!).</p><p><br /></p><p>The Roosevelt dime is damaged and is only worth face value.</p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=114180]@The1thelast[/USER] …you would be wise to trust our opinions. Many Coin Talk members have many decades of expertise in this hobby of ours and we pride ourselves in disseminating factual information. Inaccuracies are dealt with toot sweet. Remember to do your own due diligence on coins you find and post your questions on your research. If you haven’t done so already, go to doubleddie.com ( John Wexler’s website) and read everything there. Once you have read and understand the facts, tenets and concepts listed there it will launch you lightyears ahead as a collector.</p><p>Good luck and keep on hunting!…Spark[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Spark1951, post: 26002454, member: 90692"]As noted, the ‘73 has too much wear on both sides and is a common coin. The unofficial benchmark for slabbing is to have a coin worth at least $150 to justify the costs of grading, attribution, insurance and shipping (insurance and shipping is paid for there and back). You can have lesser value coins slabbed for personal reasons but don’t expect to recoup those mandatory costs. The ‘59 does appear to be an impaired proof. It looks to have full steps, too, but as a proof it does not qualify for full step (FS) attribution. The TPGs do not award the designation on labels due to the fact all proof Jefferson nickels [B]should have[/B] full steps ( if they don’t then it is a poorly struck proof!). The Roosevelt dime is damaged and is only worth face value. [USER=114180]@The1thelast[/USER] …you would be wise to trust our opinions. Many Coin Talk members have many decades of expertise in this hobby of ours and we pride ourselves in disseminating factual information. Inaccuracies are dealt with toot sweet. Remember to do your own due diligence on coins you find and post your questions on your research. If you haven’t done so already, go to doubleddie.com ( John Wexler’s website) and read everything there. Once you have read and understand the facts, tenets and concepts listed there it will launch you lightyears ahead as a collector. Good luck and keep on hunting!…Spark[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Seeking an opinion...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...