Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;vintagemintage, post: 2784044, member: 75988&quot;]Whether the count is actually right or not was not my point, I didn&#039;t post to say &quot;maybe I got shorted&quot;. Never once have I &quot;whined&quot; here, about the banks owing me something for nothing, or anything else, but obviously you have a different agenda here and chose to direct your frustrations towards me. Why Chris? Because I CRH? Now you&#039;re a self proclaimed authority about my expectations and motives? The more you say the clearer it becomes how little of a clue you have. You don&#039;t realize that you&#039;ve got the wrong guy here, or aren&#039;t mature enough to either admit it or at least just shut up.</p><p><br /></p><p>I go to the banks and ask them for a service that they are willing to provide, they have control of all the terms of the transaction and I comply with them. They know I&#039;m hunting and still they smile and say &quot;hope to see ya next week!&quot; It&#039;s good customer service. So really? Your position is that when for the first time after years, multiple boxes from different sources show up with unusual signs of tampering, it&#039;s inappropriate to put it out there and ask others if they&#039;ve seen anything similar or maybe it&#039;s an isolated case? That make me a whiner? And what&#039;s that got to do with expecting something for nothing?</p><p>Yeah you&#039;re very smart Chris with you&#039;re profound revelation 5 years ago... Do you really think <i>that&#039;s</i> when your &#039;problem&#039; started becoming a &#039;burden&#039; to the banks?&nbsp; CRH was much more prevalent 50 years ago when silver and wheaties were still a common find, yet banks have survived just fine all these decades.</p><p><br /></p><p>Chris, I didn&#039;t answer your question before for soooo many reasons. It was and still is irrelevant to the purpose of my post. I didn&#039;t even know the answer because I hadn&#039;t counted. The tone of your comments didn&#039;t deserve that I even dignify it with a response. Contrary to some others advise, I kept the box to search for varieties and other interesting finds because that&#039;s what I do. Maybe you&#039;re surprised that I&#039;m not just tearing through thousands of coins looking for silver, dumping mass quantities on the bank, and complaining I didn&#039;t find enough? Yes it&#039;s nice to find silver too, the more the better. and you&#039;re right about <i>one</i> thing... I am disappointed when I don&#039;t find anything of value. Very intuitive of you! But it&#039;s hope not expectation that keeps me coming back. So now I&#039;ve gone through the rolls, didn&#039;t find much this time, better luck next time. Let me answer your question now:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]644814[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]644817[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]644818[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]644819[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]644820[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>This type of deception probably wouldn&#039;t have gone undetected if these rolls were handled individually, but when packed in a &#039;sealed&#039; box...</p><p>Strange that only 3 rolls out of all the tampered ones were like this, makes me wonder if the perpetrator just replaced the silver he found with nickels because he didn&#039;t have any unrolled halves. He coulda at least used quarters![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in