Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;LEG END, post: 992066, member: 26139&quot;]I think we are getting hosed by the Mint. Business law states that if you cannot use something for the purpose that it was purchased for, you get your money back. That is unconditional, too. If you cannot sell this as Proof undamaged, you have a right, and an OBLIGATION, to demand to be made whole. Which is all flowery talk for getting restitution for moneys spent. If enough of us challenge that marginal return period, I think we could pull the rug out from under their logic flaw argument. Not allowing us to be made whole by making us pay for our return shipping is a prior restraint on recovering our damages. They cannot keep us from seeking our money back, and a simple three person class action suit, costs less than three hundred bucks. Or, alternatively, three hundred complaint letters. That&#039;ll cost them weeks of their administrative lives, which is like YEARS working for the government. Very untidy thing, answering a well constructed administrative complaint, and the blemish they suffer is lasting, and permanent. Nothing worse than ignoring the people who employ you, IMHO. Federal buildings suffer the minutes of their weekly meetings.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in