Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;brg5658, post: 2762442, member: 29751&quot;]Sorry, I should have been more clear.&nbsp; Because the token posted by the OP&nbsp; [USER=32000]@jlblonde[/USER] is indexed in Dalton and Hamer, <b>it is considered a Conder token</b> -- Namely, <span style="color: #b30000"><b>Scotland/Lanarkshire</b></span> (<b><span style="color: #b30000">DH-45</span></b> or <b><span style="color: #b30000">DH-48</span></b>; not really possibly to tell from the rough shape it&#039;s in).</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m not sure where [USER=12789]@scottishmoney[/USER] got the information that it was from 1837/39?&nbsp; As best I can tell (<i><span style="color: #0080ff">Transactions of the Glasgow Archaelogical Society; 1891, p. 66.</span>)</i>, versions of this token were originally struck well within the Conder era, with some later restrikes issued as late as 1830.&nbsp; D&amp;H does include later restrikes or &quot;re-issues&quot; of a few token designs from up to about 1850 that are similar or the same as those from within the Conder era.</p><p><br /></p><p>My first post in this thread was intended as a reply to [USER=12789]@scottishmoney[/USER] , not to [USER=32000]@jlblonde[/USER] .&nbsp; Sorry for the confusion.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in