Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 2137532, member: 19463&quot;]I&#039;m OK with the 10mm number.&nbsp; It is what I used for one of my pages where I showed photo taken through my microscope and 10mm was the largest that would fit in that circle of view.&nbsp; Some of these are no longer the best shots I have of the coins but it is how I came to define 10mm as tiny for my purposes.&nbsp; I no longer use the camera that shot these even though it works fine and was my first digital camera.&nbsp; We have come a long way in the 15 years since I went digital.&nbsp; It is hard to believe that I paid $1000 for a camera in 2000 that is not as good as some $100 models today.&nbsp; </p><p><a href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/microdigital.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/microdigital.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/microdigital.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/dougsmith/syrhemi.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in