Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Saturday morning blahs: Septimius Severus
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2025535, member: 19463"]Here are a few more blunders that are just a bit different (and were in the coins that got repackaged tonight). </p><p><br /></p><p>What is wrong with this one? Nothing much. Usually these show the emperor holding a staff on the reverse but here he is just waving. That is a minor variation. What makes this coin odd is that the vast majority of this type misspell PRINCIPI PBINCIPI as shown on the second coin below. B for R substitutions are relatively common but it is unusual when there are many more coins with the 'error' than ones with it correctly rendered.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]367674[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]367680[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The two coins below both show an L in place of the expected second I in INVICTO. What I find unusual is that they liked this error so much that they made it on more than one die. There are many misspelled dies on this type but usually you think of errors being a one time slip up. Not here!</p><p>[ATTACH=full]367676[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]367677[/ATTACH] </p><p>Did anyone notice that the above two coins use the same obverse die? If so, you might have a future in flyspecking die varieties for this mint that went out of its way to produce 'varieties'.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2025535, member: 19463"]Here are a few more blunders that are just a bit different (and were in the coins that got repackaged tonight). What is wrong with this one? Nothing much. Usually these show the emperor holding a staff on the reverse but here he is just waving. That is a minor variation. What makes this coin odd is that the vast majority of this type misspell PRINCIPI PBINCIPI as shown on the second coin below. B for R substitutions are relatively common but it is unusual when there are many more coins with the 'error' than ones with it correctly rendered. [ATTACH=full]367674[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]367680[/ATTACH] The two coins below both show an L in place of the expected second I in INVICTO. What I find unusual is that they liked this error so much that they made it on more than one die. There are many misspelled dies on this type but usually you think of errors being a one time slip up. Not here! [ATTACH=full]367676[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]367677[/ATTACH] Did anyone notice that the above two coins use the same obverse die? If so, you might have a future in flyspecking die varieties for this mint that went out of its way to produce 'varieties'.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Saturday morning blahs: Septimius Severus
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...