Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GSDykes, post: 2256169, member: 73321&quot;]Okay four images follow. The first is the 1964 PROOF, obverse. showing off my photographic talent (if any). The satin fields are self evident. The second photo shows a 1964 uncirculated side by side with the unusual satin field proof. The third image shows the reverse of the 1964 proof, satin fields. And the last image shows a close up of both reverses, the 1964 proof and the 1964 uncirculated. I do not have the usual mirror-field 1964 proof. Hope this assists. Zoom in to see details, they are high resolution!</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; PS. I can also, send a copy of Stanton&#039;s letter verifying the 1964 proof, as a genuine proof. But my word suffices. (or it should&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie80" alt=":shame:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> )</p><p>Gary in Washington</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]447155[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]447156[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]447157[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]447158[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in