Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Same Engraver?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="David Atherton, post: 4650511, member: 82616"]I've had a hunch for some time that the so called 'imperial' and 'senatorial' mints (at least during the late First Century) were not separate entities. Almost certainly the senatorial mint was either controlled by the emperor or appointed senators carrying out the palace's bidding. However, I recently acquired a Domitian sestertius that I believe also demonstrates the precious metal and bronze coinages were actually produced from the same workshops, or at the very least shared the same workers.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1148499[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Domitian</b></p><p>Æ Sestertius, 25.13g</p><p>Rome mint, 95-96 AD</p><p>Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM COS XVII CENS PER P P; Head of Domitian, laureate, bearded, r.</p><p>Rev: IOVI VICTORI; S C in exergue; Jupiter std. l., with Victory and sceptre</p><p>RIC 794 (C). BMC 474. BNC 504.</p><p>Acquired from London Ancient Coins, July 2020.</p><p><br /></p><p>A common seated Jupiter type from Domitian's last bronze issue. Just like the silver and gold, Domitian's aes coinage from the mid 80s onwards settled down to a few predicable reverse types. The Sestertii were dominated by Victory crowning the emperor and the seated Jupiter with Victory. 'Jupiter the giver of Victory' was not only an important propaganda type but also one that was closely associated with Domitian. This sestertius is imprecisely dated between 95-96 because Domitian did not take up the consulship in 96.</p><p><br /></p><p>The style is very similar to the contemporaneous denarius issues. As a matter of fact, the denarius pictured below appears to be engraved by the same hand as the above sestertius. The style is identical, even down to the rounded portrait and 'eyes to heaven' gaze.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1148501[/ATTACH]</p><p> </p><p><b>Domitian</b></p><p>AR Denarius, 3.27g</p><p>Rome mint, 95 AD</p><p>Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM P M TR P XIIII; Head of Domitian, laureate, bearded, r.</p><p>Rev: IMP XXII COS XVII CENS P P P; Minerva adv r., with spear and shield (M1)</p><p>RIC 770 (C2). BMC 222. RSC 288. BNC 199.</p><p>Ex Dionysos Numismatik, eBay, April 2014.</p><p><br /></p><p>'S.C.' (Senatus Consultum) was in name only and coins bearing that inscription were likely produced at the same mint or workshops as the 'imperial' precious metal issues.</p><p><br /></p><p>Please share any coins you believe may, or indeed may not, back up the above theory.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="David Atherton, post: 4650511, member: 82616"]I've had a hunch for some time that the so called 'imperial' and 'senatorial' mints (at least during the late First Century) were not separate entities. Almost certainly the senatorial mint was either controlled by the emperor or appointed senators carrying out the palace's bidding. However, I recently acquired a Domitian sestertius that I believe also demonstrates the precious metal and bronze coinages were actually produced from the same workshops, or at the very least shared the same workers. [ATTACH=full]1148499[/ATTACH] [B]Domitian[/B] Æ Sestertius, 25.13g Rome mint, 95-96 AD Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM COS XVII CENS PER P P; Head of Domitian, laureate, bearded, r. Rev: IOVI VICTORI; S C in exergue; Jupiter std. l., with Victory and sceptre RIC 794 (C). BMC 474. BNC 504. Acquired from London Ancient Coins, July 2020. A common seated Jupiter type from Domitian's last bronze issue. Just like the silver and gold, Domitian's aes coinage from the mid 80s onwards settled down to a few predicable reverse types. The Sestertii were dominated by Victory crowning the emperor and the seated Jupiter with Victory. 'Jupiter the giver of Victory' was not only an important propaganda type but also one that was closely associated with Domitian. This sestertius is imprecisely dated between 95-96 because Domitian did not take up the consulship in 96. The style is very similar to the contemporaneous denarius issues. As a matter of fact, the denarius pictured below appears to be engraved by the same hand as the above sestertius. The style is identical, even down to the rounded portrait and 'eyes to heaven' gaze. [ATTACH=full]1148501[/ATTACH] [B]Domitian[/B] AR Denarius, 3.27g Rome mint, 95 AD Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM P M TR P XIIII; Head of Domitian, laureate, bearded, r. Rev: IMP XXII COS XVII CENS P P P; Minerva adv r., with spear and shield (M1) RIC 770 (C2). BMC 222. RSC 288. BNC 199. Ex Dionysos Numismatik, eBay, April 2014. 'S.C.' (Senatus Consultum) was in name only and coins bearing that inscription were likely produced at the same mint or workshops as the 'imperial' precious metal issues. Please share any coins you believe may, or indeed may not, back up the above theory.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Same Engraver?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...