Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Safety of Cardboard Coin Storage Boxes?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Publius2, post: 8410994, member: 105571"]I appreciate the responses. Since I posted I've been doing some research and while certainly not definitive nor expert, I've drawn some tentative conclusions that, I believe, may help to reconcile the conflicting accounts of our experienced and knowledgeable respondents.</p><p><br /></p><p>1) The terms "archival" and "acid-free" are thrown around marketing efforts pretty loosely and generally seem to be equivalents in coin product circles. But they are not equivalent. In order to be "archival" quality, a paper product must be made of rag paper and meet certain ANSI and ISO standards. All other products that are made of wood pulp and are labeled "acid-free" may or may not meet the other standards that govern wood-based "archival" paper products. But a paper-based "acid-free" product must have a neutral or slightly acid pH and contain a buffering compound that neutralizes the hydrochloric acid gas released when the lignin in the paper degrades. So, most "art paper" that you buy for making labels and such that is acid-free will probably contain these buffering compounds. The best paper to use is a rag-based "archival" paper, bar none since there is no lignin to degrade at all.</p><p><br /></p><p>2) Who knows what companies like Lighthouse mean when they say their Intercept boxes are made of "archival" materials. Somehow, I doubt it meets the rag paper standard. (I mean no disrespect to Lighthouse or their undoubtedly fine products and I'm not singling them out except that their statements are useful for making a point.) Lighthouse states that their Intercept Shield technology protects against the dangers of paper breakdown so it may be a moot point whether their paper products are rag or wood based. Other products with wood-based paper and without the Intercept Shield technology are probably more hazardous to your coins, but how much more hazardous?</p><p><br /></p><p>3) The off-gassing that comes from wood-based paper is from the degradation of the lignin in the wood base. Take UV light, moisture, and heat and the lignin can break down very quickly. For example, the cheap newsprint paper turns yellow in hours if you let the paper sit in your driveway for a day. But of these three elements, the one that is the worst is the UV in sunlight (or any other light source but sunlight has a very strong UV component). The other two, humidity and heat, just accelerate the process of lignin breakdown and development of hydrochloric gas.</p><p><br /></p><p>4) Chlorine in the paper comes primarily from the bleaching process. Sulfides can come from the paper-making process as well as well as from glues, dyes, tapes, inks in addition to the general atmosphere.</p><p><br /></p><p>5) I take [USER=112]@GDJMSP[/USER] at his word that he has witnessed damage from improper storage around and in improper materials. But I also take the word and experience of other responders that they have used un-certified products for decades without damage to their coins. How can this be? Well, I suspect it comes from a difference in how the products were stored. Keep these non-archival materials away from UV light, heat and moisture and they will not degrade at a significant rate at all and thus won't accumulate harmful chemicals at a rate/concentration that won't be flushed away when the box is opened. Those that keep their coins at home in a safe with a desiccant are, generally, going to look at their coins more often than those who are keeping them in a safe deposit box. Conditions in both locations are usually temperature controlled and both limit UV light effectively, but the safe deposit box will often (usually?) not have a desiccant and will be flushed less often.</p><p><br /></p><p>What, you may ask, am I now going to do after creating all this verbal mush? I am going to invest in some Lighthouse slab boxes with the Intercept Shield technology for my storage locations where the size of the Lighthouse boxes can be accommodated. In my other storage locations where space doesn't permit Lighthouse, I will continue to use the "non-archival" boxes but continue my practices of desiccant use and frequent flushing. One additional change though will be to eliminate paper document storage and make it separate from coin storage. The same basic reason why you shouldn't store your coins where you store your guns.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks again for everyone's thought-provoking responses.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Publius2, post: 8410994, member: 105571"]I appreciate the responses. Since I posted I've been doing some research and while certainly not definitive nor expert, I've drawn some tentative conclusions that, I believe, may help to reconcile the conflicting accounts of our experienced and knowledgeable respondents. 1) The terms "archival" and "acid-free" are thrown around marketing efforts pretty loosely and generally seem to be equivalents in coin product circles. But they are not equivalent. In order to be "archival" quality, a paper product must be made of rag paper and meet certain ANSI and ISO standards. All other products that are made of wood pulp and are labeled "acid-free" may or may not meet the other standards that govern wood-based "archival" paper products. But a paper-based "acid-free" product must have a neutral or slightly acid pH and contain a buffering compound that neutralizes the hydrochloric acid gas released when the lignin in the paper degrades. So, most "art paper" that you buy for making labels and such that is acid-free will probably contain these buffering compounds. The best paper to use is a rag-based "archival" paper, bar none since there is no lignin to degrade at all. 2) Who knows what companies like Lighthouse mean when they say their Intercept boxes are made of "archival" materials. Somehow, I doubt it meets the rag paper standard. (I mean no disrespect to Lighthouse or their undoubtedly fine products and I'm not singling them out except that their statements are useful for making a point.) Lighthouse states that their Intercept Shield technology protects against the dangers of paper breakdown so it may be a moot point whether their paper products are rag or wood based. Other products with wood-based paper and without the Intercept Shield technology are probably more hazardous to your coins, but how much more hazardous? 3) The off-gassing that comes from wood-based paper is from the degradation of the lignin in the wood base. Take UV light, moisture, and heat and the lignin can break down very quickly. For example, the cheap newsprint paper turns yellow in hours if you let the paper sit in your driveway for a day. But of these three elements, the one that is the worst is the UV in sunlight (or any other light source but sunlight has a very strong UV component). The other two, humidity and heat, just accelerate the process of lignin breakdown and development of hydrochloric gas. 4) Chlorine in the paper comes primarily from the bleaching process. Sulfides can come from the paper-making process as well as well as from glues, dyes, tapes, inks in addition to the general atmosphere. 5) I take [USER=112]@GDJMSP[/USER] at his word that he has witnessed damage from improper storage around and in improper materials. But I also take the word and experience of other responders that they have used un-certified products for decades without damage to their coins. How can this be? Well, I suspect it comes from a difference in how the products were stored. Keep these non-archival materials away from UV light, heat and moisture and they will not degrade at a significant rate at all and thus won't accumulate harmful chemicals at a rate/concentration that won't be flushed away when the box is opened. Those that keep their coins at home in a safe with a desiccant are, generally, going to look at their coins more often than those who are keeping them in a safe deposit box. Conditions in both locations are usually temperature controlled and both limit UV light effectively, but the safe deposit box will often (usually?) not have a desiccant and will be flushed less often. What, you may ask, am I now going to do after creating all this verbal mush? I am going to invest in some Lighthouse slab boxes with the Intercept Shield technology for my storage locations where the size of the Lighthouse boxes can be accommodated. In my other storage locations where space doesn't permit Lighthouse, I will continue to use the "non-archival" boxes but continue my practices of desiccant use and frequent flushing. One additional change though will be to eliminate paper document storage and make it separate from coin storage. The same basic reason why you shouldn't store your coins where you store your guns. Thanks again for everyone's thought-provoking responses.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Safety of Cardboard Coin Storage Boxes?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...