Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Michael K, post: 3287320, member: 78298&quot;]I don&#039;t think there even is an S over D 1968 Lincoln.</p><p>Here is a list from the LCR and some interesting text below.</p><p><a href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1944omm1and2.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1944omm1and2.html" rel="nofollow">1944 d/s omm 11944 d/s omm 2</a><a href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1946omm.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1946omm.html" rel="nofollow">1946 s/d omm 1</a><a href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1951omms.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1951omms.html" rel="nofollow">1951 d/s omm 11951 d/s omm 2</a><a href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1952omm.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1952omm.html" rel="nofollow">1952 d/s omm 1</a><a href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1956wdmm1.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1956wdmm1.html" rel="nofollow">1956 d/s omm 1 wdmm 1 (dual mintmark)</a><a href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1956womm1.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/OMMS/1956womm1.html" rel="nofollow">1956 d/d/s omm 2</a></p><p><br /></p><p>The above list represents the most commonly accepted over mintmarks </p><p>(OMM&#039;s) in the Lincoln Cent Series.&nbsp; It may seem strange to you that the mint </p><p>would change its mind after punching a mintmark, especially if you think that </p><p>the S mintmark is punched at the San Fransisco Mint and the D mintmark is </p><p>punched at the Denver mint.&nbsp; The truth is that both the S and D mintmarks are </p><p>punched at the Philadelphia mint where all dies are prepared.&nbsp; So a mint </p><p>employee could easily change a D to an S for a variety of reasons before the </p><p>dies are shipped to their respective mints.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>What about the <a href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/Controversial/Cents.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.lincolncentresource.com/Controversial/Cents.html" rel="nofollow">1980 D/S cent</a>?&nbsp; </p><p>The 1980 D/S omm 1 was debunked in 2006.&nbsp; <i>Die Variety News</i> had an article </p><p>proving that what looked like an S was actually die gouges in the field.&nbsp; The </p><p>article was Vol. No 2. July/Aug 2006 written by Billy Crawford.&nbsp; Also, ANACS no </p><p>longer certifies this variety.&nbsp; Some collectors and dealers are not aware of </p><p>this.&nbsp; Investing in this variety is not recommended.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in