Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CheetahCats, post: 836079, member: 23874&quot;]Below please find a webpoll that is being conducted by the Washington Post, though it is unscientific, and [probably] reflects the demographic readership of that particular news organization. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>(*Note that some folks believe that The Washington Post leans too much in one particular direction.) </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The poll:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&quot;Who deserves the nation&#039;s next monetary tribute?&quot;</p><p><a href="http://www.twiigs.com/poll/Politics/50128?results=1" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.twiigs.com/poll/Politics/50128?results=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.twiigs.com/poll/Politics/50128?results=1</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p>As of 14 March 2010, 14:49 EDT, the results are the following:</p><ul> <li>Pro-Reagan: 30%</li> <li>Pro-Dr. King: 22%</li> <li>Pro-A woman: 12%</li> <li>Pro-A Native American: 9%</li> <li>Pro-Someone else: 25%</li> </ul><p>Based on the wording of the poll, this implies that 68% (a majority) of respondees are not in favor of Reagan. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>That said, however, the poll did not include a choice for &quot;No One&quot;, or something to the effect of &quot;Money shouldn&#039;t have images of idolatry&quot;, or something to the effect of &quot;Return to symbolic images of Liberty etc.&quot;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Just my two cents [again] :smile[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in