Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Romulus Augustus Bronze Coin Die
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Moe "Wolfy" Wilder, post: 8284480, member: 114824"]I must say I understand the suspicious and disbelief, but I appreciate the respect and courtesy, not the derision. Again, I apologize for the suspiciously poor images. I'm not joking or making this up or chasing shadows. I have been cleaning and collecting world coins since 1972 and started cleaning ancients since 2001. Eventually I was buying pounds and selling ounces, and skimming 100 coins for my self from each pound that crossed my desk. So, I am not a newbie amateur. I know how to tell letters from an overstrike from originally struck letters. I'm thinking of writing a paper on LRB countermarks because no one has done it yet and a have a pile of them. I have cleaned literally thousands have studied thousands more online. I have read all the books and know just how crazy everything will think this is. I know it's not arcadius or honorius. The coin is what I'm telling you it is, and eventually I will get an image to show it. I would have already, but my scanner took a dump and I simply don't have the equipment or steady hands to get a clear image of such a tiny item. I think my daughter's phone is capable, but she was too rushed and shaky this time to get it right. The legends look nothing like LEO's clunky letters. They aren't exactly the pretty letters from 70 years earlier either, but they fit RA's entire name and titles on his Tremisses which was only 3-4 mm larger- check wildwinds, there are 3 tremisses that are larger gold versions of my coin. </p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/romulus_augustus/RIC_3419.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/romulus_augustus/RIC_3419.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/romulus_augustus/RIC_3419.jpg</a> </p><p><br /></p><p>My coin is too small and light to pass for a tremisses, but that's the closest resemblance to compare it too. </p><p><br /></p><p>I didn't know what the Mankaphas was so I posted it to zeno.ru and immediate got the, No it can't be, you're so FOS. THEN the expert on the subject entered and confirmed it's identity. SO PLZ don't doubt my ability or call my ethics into question here.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.zeno.ru/showphoto.php?photo=10681" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.zeno.ru/showphoto.php?photo=10681" rel="nofollow">https://www.zeno.ru/showphoto.php?photo=10681</a></p><p><br /></p><p>The Lealianus and the Mankaphas were stolen with my entire 1200+ ancient collection in 2007.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Moe "Wolfy" Wilder, post: 8284480, member: 114824"]I must say I understand the suspicious and disbelief, but I appreciate the respect and courtesy, not the derision. Again, I apologize for the suspiciously poor images. I'm not joking or making this up or chasing shadows. I have been cleaning and collecting world coins since 1972 and started cleaning ancients since 2001. Eventually I was buying pounds and selling ounces, and skimming 100 coins for my self from each pound that crossed my desk. So, I am not a newbie amateur. I know how to tell letters from an overstrike from originally struck letters. I'm thinking of writing a paper on LRB countermarks because no one has done it yet and a have a pile of them. I have cleaned literally thousands have studied thousands more online. I have read all the books and know just how crazy everything will think this is. I know it's not arcadius or honorius. The coin is what I'm telling you it is, and eventually I will get an image to show it. I would have already, but my scanner took a dump and I simply don't have the equipment or steady hands to get a clear image of such a tiny item. I think my daughter's phone is capable, but she was too rushed and shaky this time to get it right. The legends look nothing like LEO's clunky letters. They aren't exactly the pretty letters from 70 years earlier either, but they fit RA's entire name and titles on his Tremisses which was only 3-4 mm larger- check wildwinds, there are 3 tremisses that are larger gold versions of my coin. [URL]http://wildwinds.com/coins/ric/romulus_augustus/RIC_3419.jpg[/URL] My coin is too small and light to pass for a tremisses, but that's the closest resemblance to compare it too. I didn't know what the Mankaphas was so I posted it to zeno.ru and immediate got the, No it can't be, you're so FOS. THEN the expert on the subject entered and confirmed it's identity. SO PLZ don't doubt my ability or call my ethics into question here. [URL]https://www.zeno.ru/showphoto.php?photo=10681[/URL] The Lealianus and the Mankaphas were stolen with my entire 1200+ ancient collection in 2007.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Romulus Augustus Bronze Coin Die
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...