Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Rome Sacked by Alaric and the Visigoths - August 24th, 410
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 7852812, member: 19463"]I believe what we see here is what would be called 'net grading' where the grade is reduced a little or a lot for faults. The certificate mentions a slight bend in the flan which could have been worse making the coin overall a VF. Before NGC introduced their numbering system and added grades above EF based solely on wear, ancient coins topped out at EF except for the rare FDC (fleur de coin) properly used for only perfect examples. The coin is very nice but I believe most old school graders would accept "almost EF" as fair. Some purists would see the wear on the hair right of the diadem and say it was overgraded. That is why Sear placed that disclaimer paragraph at the bottom and why you are 110% correct not to "care in the least". I am not a professional grader and have never been solicited to become one BUT I would expect this coin to get a 'Fine Style' on a current slab recognizing the fact that the portrait makes Honorius look like a </p><p>. </p><p><br /></p><p>How many kids who grew up while dad was in power turned out to be strong and 'good' emperors? Titus and Constantine I were adults when their fathers rose to power. Constantius II, perhaps? </p><p><br /></p><p>Siliqua, Mediolanum, clashed dies, ex. Ken Dorney 1998</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1352510[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>AE</p><p>This one is so bad it is good and, better, identifiable ORIVS.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1352511[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1352513[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1352514[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1352515[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>As a representative coin of Honorius, I prefer this type showing the three emperors scaled by height. For about ten, Honorius almost seems tall. Mine is a little tight but many of these are off center or small flan enough to make it hard to tell who is on the obverse. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1352516[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Honorius was emperor in the West but almost all of his bronze coins we see were from Eastern mints. Who has a Western bronze? Is this a case where gold is more common than bronze?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 7852812, member: 19463"]I believe what we see here is what would be called 'net grading' where the grade is reduced a little or a lot for faults. The certificate mentions a slight bend in the flan which could have been worse making the coin overall a VF. Before NGC introduced their numbering system and added grades above EF based solely on wear, ancient coins topped out at EF except for the rare FDC (fleur de coin) properly used for only perfect examples. The coin is very nice but I believe most old school graders would accept "almost EF" as fair. Some purists would see the wear on the hair right of the diadem and say it was overgraded. That is why Sear placed that disclaimer paragraph at the bottom and why you are 110% correct not to "care in the least". I am not a professional grader and have never been solicited to become one BUT I would expect this coin to get a 'Fine Style' on a current slab recognizing the fact that the portrait makes Honorius look like a . How many kids who grew up while dad was in power turned out to be strong and 'good' emperors? Titus and Constantine I were adults when their fathers rose to power. Constantius II, perhaps? Siliqua, Mediolanum, clashed dies, ex. Ken Dorney 1998 [ATTACH=full]1352510[/ATTACH] AE This one is so bad it is good and, better, identifiable ORIVS. [ATTACH=full]1352511[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1352513[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1352514[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1352515[/ATTACH] As a representative coin of Honorius, I prefer this type showing the three emperors scaled by height. For about ten, Honorius almost seems tall. Mine is a little tight but many of these are off center or small flan enough to make it hard to tell who is on the obverse. [ATTACH=full]1352516[/ATTACH] Honorius was emperor in the West but almost all of his bronze coins we see were from Eastern mints. Who has a Western bronze? Is this a case where gold is more common than bronze?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Rome Sacked by Alaric and the Visigoths - August 24th, 410
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...