Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Romans vs. Parthians
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Sulla80, post: 4593872, member: 99456"]Thanks - I needed to look closer at the anchor - easy to see once you pointed it out! [USER=51347]@Alegandron[/USER] has a real 48.9 (sideways E instead of crescent at the top). I corrected in OP too so that I don't mislead someone else. Also glad to see some Parthians turn out including your Orodes II tetradrachm.</p><p>The trading card does inspire silliness, I'll now have to puzzle over what the Parthians role was in inventing meat extracts. Thanks for sharing <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> and I certainly enjoy your Tetradrachm!</p><p>Although I've demonstrated in the OP that I can't tell the difference between a sellwood "anchor ii" and "anchor iv", I'll hazard a confirmation that your Susa (with stick figure mint mark) is still an Orodes II even with recent revisions.</p><p>I'm not sure whether to be reassured or concerned at the possibility of wide-ranging alien interference<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Always nice to see a Parthian AE - I find they don't show up much at all, let alone as nice as your example.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Sulla80, post: 4593872, member: 99456"]Thanks - I needed to look closer at the anchor - easy to see once you pointed it out! [USER=51347]@Alegandron[/USER] has a real 48.9 (sideways E instead of crescent at the top). I corrected in OP too so that I don't mislead someone else. Also glad to see some Parthians turn out including your Orodes II tetradrachm. The trading card does inspire silliness, I'll now have to puzzle over what the Parthians role was in inventing meat extracts. Thanks for sharing :) and I certainly enjoy your Tetradrachm! Although I've demonstrated in the OP that I can't tell the difference between a sellwood "anchor ii" and "anchor iv", I'll hazard a confirmation that your Susa (with stick figure mint mark) is still an Orodes II even with recent revisions. I'm not sure whether to be reassured or concerned at the possibility of wide-ranging alien interference;) Always nice to see a Parthian AE - I find they don't show up much at all, let alone as nice as your example.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Romans vs. Parthians
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...