Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Roman Republican Denarius 46: Desultor
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 6538597, member: 110350"]Nice coin! There's no difference among the designs for 363/1a-1d. They differ only in the existence and/or placement of the control-symbols. 1a has control-symbols on both sides. 1b has a control-symbol only on the obverse. 1c has a control-symbol only on the reverse. 1d has no control-symbol on either side. My own example of 363 is 1d because there are no visible control marks on either side, although there's a faint indication on the obverse of what might be a worn-off control-symbol, which would make mine 1b. I see no control marks on either side of yours, so it's probably 1d.</p><p><br /></p><p>I suspect that the marks where the beginning of the reverse legend should be are indeed countermarks, bankers' marks, etc.</p><p><br /></p><p>The coin looks genuine to me. I'm no expert on tooling, but the outlines of the designs don't look unusually sharp to me, despite the wear on the high points of the design. Besides, tooling is, if I understand correctly, not nearly as common on silver coins as it is on bronze coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 6538597, member: 110350"]Nice coin! There's no difference among the designs for 363/1a-1d. They differ only in the existence and/or placement of the control-symbols. 1a has control-symbols on both sides. 1b has a control-symbol only on the obverse. 1c has a control-symbol only on the reverse. 1d has no control-symbol on either side. My own example of 363 is 1d because there are no visible control marks on either side, although there's a faint indication on the obverse of what might be a worn-off control-symbol, which would make mine 1b. I see no control marks on either side of yours, so it's probably 1d. I suspect that the marks where the beginning of the reverse legend should be are indeed countermarks, bankers' marks, etc. The coin looks genuine to me. I'm no expert on tooling, but the outlines of the designs don't look unusually sharp to me, despite the wear on the high points of the design. Besides, tooling is, if I understand correctly, not nearly as common on silver coins as it is on bronze coins.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Roman Republican Denarius 46: Desultor
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...