Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jamesicus, post: 3713458, member: 14873&quot;]No.</p><p><br /></p><p>But look, I am an easy guy to get along with - I wrote elsewhere the following:</p><ul> <li>The London Mint coinage information is now based on THE ROMAN IMPERIAL COINAGE, Volume VI, Londinium (RIC - Sutherland) and THE LONDON MINT OF CONSTANTIUS AND CONSTANTINE (CT - Cloke/Toone) which includes considerable additional and revised material, including a new catalog numbering and attribution system and a rarity assessment for each listed coin.</li> <li>RIC uses follis/folles as the nomenclature for this coinage while CT uses nummus/nummi.</li> <li>I use RIC catalog numbers for all coin depictions (if applicable) and include equivalent CT catalog numbers where appropriate.</li> </ul><p>In the spirit of friendship (both to you, Al Kowsky, and especially to my good friend Hugh Cloke) I will use follis/nummus (folles/nummi) in the future when discussing those coins here. But I will continue to use follis (folles) on my web pages because that is how they are categorized and named in RIC.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in