Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Roman Imperial vs Provincial
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Finn235, post: 3731444, member: 98035"]It's less clear with early coins; Most coins of Augustus are inscribed in Latin, even the ones of cities where Greek was everyone's first language. The explosion of Greek-inscribed provincial coins comes with Nero (who was a Hellenophile) and further expanded with the Flavian dynasty, and continued until the provincial mints were converted to imperial under the later Crisis emperors - by the time of Aurelian's death, it was pretty much only Alexandria striking provincial coins, and Alexandria was stripped of that privilege in 297 for supporting the rebellion of Domitianus. Bosporus struck the absolute last provincial coins, under Rhescuporis VI around the time of Constantine and Licinius.</p><p><br /></p><p>Imperial coins are usually fairly easy to distinguish, as they follow fairly strict patterns; Even in the latin-inscribed provincial coins, you never see reverse legends along the lines of "PM TR P XIII COS III PP", "ANNONA AVGG", "VICT PART MAX" etc, and except for Antioch, the provincial coins almost never bear SC on them, which was mandatory for all Imperial bronzes.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Finn235, post: 3731444, member: 98035"]It's less clear with early coins; Most coins of Augustus are inscribed in Latin, even the ones of cities where Greek was everyone's first language. The explosion of Greek-inscribed provincial coins comes with Nero (who was a Hellenophile) and further expanded with the Flavian dynasty, and continued until the provincial mints were converted to imperial under the later Crisis emperors - by the time of Aurelian's death, it was pretty much only Alexandria striking provincial coins, and Alexandria was stripped of that privilege in 297 for supporting the rebellion of Domitianus. Bosporus struck the absolute last provincial coins, under Rhescuporis VI around the time of Constantine and Licinius. Imperial coins are usually fairly easy to distinguish, as they follow fairly strict patterns; Even in the latin-inscribed provincial coins, you never see reverse legends along the lines of "PM TR P XIII COS III PP", "ANNONA AVGG", "VICT PART MAX" etc, and except for Antioch, the provincial coins almost never bear SC on them, which was mandatory for all Imperial bronzes.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Roman Imperial vs Provincial
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...