Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 3074659, member: 27832&quot;]Yeah, that was me. As I posted in a follow-up message, I suspect they may be simply sorting on weight, not other properties -- in the three rolls I bought, there were <i>no</i> heavily-worn coins. I&#039;m used to AU or better quarters from the 1960s, but the ones from the 40s and 50s are usually no better than F-VF, and frequently worn down to G.</p><p><br /></p><p>I suspect that the heavily-worn earlier quarters slip past because they&#039;re closer in weight to clad. Of course, I don&#039;t know what they&#039;re <i>really</i> doing to these coins while they&#039;re boxing them, but I wonder.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in